A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Disentangling top-down and bottom-up influences on blinks in the visual and auditory domain. | LitMetric

Disentangling top-down and bottom-up influences on blinks in the visual and auditory domain.

Int J Psychophysiol

Department of Psychology III, University of Wuerzburg, Germany. Electronic address:

Published: December 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • Sensory input and cognitive factors both affect blinking behavior, with this study aiming to differentiate between sensory-driven and cognitive influences in visual and auditory contexts.
  • A decrease in blink probability was observed prior to visual stimuli, while attentional tasks increased blink rates for both visual and auditory inputs.
  • Results suggest that blinking is influenced by cognitive factors like prediction and attention, not solely on sensory inputs, highlighting a complex interaction between sensory and cognitive processes.

Article Abstract

Sensory input as well as cognitive factors can drive the modulation of blinking. Our aim was to dissociate sensory driven bottom-up from cognitive top-down influences on blinking behavior and compare these influences between the auditory and the visual domain. Using an oddball paradigm, we found a significant pre-stimulus decrease in blink probability for visual input compared to auditory input. Sensory input further led to an early post-stimulus blink increase in both modalities if a task demanded attention to the input. Only visual input caused a pronounced early increase without a task. In case of a target or the omission of a stimulus (as compared to standard input), an additional late increase in blink rate was found in the auditory and visual domain. This suggests that blink modulation must be based on the interpretation of the input, but does not need any sensory input at all to occur. Our results show a complex modulation of blinking based on top-down factors such as prediction and attention in addition to sensory-based influences. The magnitude of the modulation is mainly influenced by general attentional demands, while the latency of this modulation allows dissociating general from specific top-down influences that are independent of the sensory domain.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.11.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sensory input
12
input
9
modulation blinking
8
top-down influences
8
auditory visual
8
visual domain
8
visual input
8
input sensory
8
influences
5
visual
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!