Recently, flood risk assessments have been extended to national and continental scales. Most of these assessments assume homogeneous scenarios, i.e. the regional risk estimate is obtained by summing up the local estimates, whereas each local damage value has the same probability of exceedance. This homogeneity assumption ignores the spatial variability in the flood generation processes. Here, we develop a multi-site, extreme value statistical model for 379 catchments across Europe, generate synthetic flood time series which consider the spatial correlation between flood peaks in all catchments, and compute corresponding economic damages. We find that the homogeneity assumption overestimates the 200-year flood damage, a benchmark indicator for the insurance industry, by 139%, 188% and 246% for the United Kingdom (UK), Germany and Europe, respectively. Our study demonstrates the importance of considering the spatial dependence patterns, particularly of extremes, in large-scale risk assessments.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653947PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76523-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risk assessments
12
national continental
8
flood risk
8
spatial dependence
8
homogeneity assumption
8
flood
6
biases national
4
continental flood
4
risk
4
assessments
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!