A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Examining PM concentrations and exposure using multiple models. | LitMetric

Epidemiologic studies have found associations between fine particulate matter (PM) exposure and adverse health effects using exposure models that incorporate monitoring data and other relevant information. Here, we use nine PM concentration models (i.e., exposure models) that span a wide range of methods to investigate i) PM concentrations in 2011, ii) potential changes in PM concentrations between 2011 and 2028 due to on-the-books regulations, and iii) PM exposure for the U.S. population and four racial/ethnic groups. The exposure models included two geophysical chemical transport models (CTMs), two interpolation methods, a satellite-derived aerosol optical depth-based method, a Bayesian statistical regression model, and three data-rich machine learning methods. We focused on annual predictions that were regridded to 12-km resolution over the conterminous U.S., but also considered 1-km predictions in sensitivity analyses. The exposure models predicted broadly consistent PM concentrations, with relatively high concentrations on average over the eastern U.S. and greater variability in the western U.S. However, differences in national concentration distributions (median standard deviation: 1.00 μg m) and spatial distributions over urban areas were evident. Further exploration of these differences and their implications for specific applications would be valuable. PM concentrations were estimated to decrease by about 1 μg m on average due to modeled emission changes between 2011 and 2028, with decreases of more than 3 μg m in areas with relatively high 2011 concentrations that were projected to experience relatively large emission reductions. Agreement among models was closer for population-weighted than uniformly weighted averages across the domain. About 50% of the population was estimated to experience PM concentrations less than 10 μg m in 2011 and PM improvements of about 2 μg m due to modeled emission changes between 2011 and 2028. Two inequality metrics were used to characterize differences in exposure among the four racial/ethnic groups. The metrics generally yielded consistent information and suggest that the modeled emission reductions between 2011 and 2028 would reduce absolute exposure inequality on average.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102649PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110432DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

exposure models
16
2011 2028
16
modeled emission
12
exposure
9
models
8
concentrations 2011
8
racial/ethnic groups
8
emission changes
8
changes 2011
8
emission reductions
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!