Hypothesis: We aimed to investigate the effect of the head excursion angle on the success of the Sémont Maneuver (SM).
Background: SM is performed with the head turned by 45 degrees toward the unaffected ear. In clinical routine, it is unlikely that physicians can turn the head to a position of exactly 45 degrees. Moreover, it is unclear how possible deviations from 45 degrees would affect the outcome with SM.
Methods: We used an in vitro model (upscaled by ×5) of a posterior semicircular canal with canalithiasis to study head excursion angles (0-75 degrees) and minimum waiting times in SM. Additionally, we measured actual head excursion angles performed by trained physicians during SM on a healthy subject.
Results: Successful canalith repositioning to the utricle was possible at head excursion angles between 21 and 67 degrees. Waiting time increased from 16 to 30 seconds with increasing deviation from 45 degrees. Angles larger than 67 degrees or smaller than 21 degrees did not lead to successful repositioning even after a waiting period of 5 minutes. Physicians set head excursion angles of 50 degrees ±SD 4.8 degrees while performing the SM.
Conclusion: Angular deviations up to ±20 degrees from the ideal SCC plane (45 degrees) still allows for successful SM. Although the tested physicians tended to underestimate the actual head excursion angle by 5 degrees (and more), the success of SM will not be affected provided that the waiting time is sufficiently long. Further, the results suggest that the Brandt-Daroff maneuver is a form of habituation training rather than a liberatory maneuver.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880166 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002992 | DOI Listing |
JPRAS Open
March 2025
Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital of Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, NRW, Germany.
Background: Despite the encouraging findings of temporalis muscle-based facial reanimation surgery without the need for nerve grafting, there is a need for comprehensive evaluation of the impact of temporalis-based facial reanimation surgery on key outcome measures.
Methods: Comprehensive search in Medline and Embase databases were carried out up to 25 February 2023. The articles that examined facial reanimation surgery using the temporalis muscle were included in this study.
Gait Posture
December 2024
Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Harvard, MA, United States.
Traffic Inj Prev
November 2024
ProBiomechanics LLC, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.
Objective: The effect of shoulder-belt load-limiting was evaluated on right-front passenger kinematics in 90 km/h oblique OMDB (offset moving deformable barrier) impacts and compared to kinematics in 56 km/h NCAP crash tests. The study focused on the influence of webbing pulling out of the retractor increasing forward excursion of the upper torso and head.
Methods: 18 OMDB crash tests were conducted by NHTSA at 90 km/h.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
November 2024
University of North Carolina Department of Otolaryngology, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Objective: The cross-facial nerve graft (CFNG) is employed in facial reanimation surgery to restore neural connectivity from the nonparalyzed side of the face to the paralyzed side, facilitating spontaneous smiling. Typically, the sural nerve, due to its length, serves as the donor graft. Implantation involves functional facial branch transection to provide graft input.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Biomech
December 2024
Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, IBHGC - Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Paris, France.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!