Purpose: The use of zygomatic implants is an alternative to major grafting procedures for the treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla. However, only few studies reported solid and correct data about the use of extrasinus zygomatic implants. Starting from these considerations, this study aims to investigate the 1-year survival and success rates of extrasinus zygomatic implants immediately loaded in patients with severe atrophy of the posterior maxilla.
Methods: Twenty-three consecutive patients fully edentoulus or with failing dentition in the upper arch and with a severe atrophy of the posterior maxilla were enrolled. All patients underwent prosthodontic rehabilitation with the application of implants in both anterior maxilla areas and zygomatic bone. All the zygomatic implants were inserted with an extrasinus path. Primary outcomes were prosthesis and implant failures. Secondary outcomes were complications, bleeding scores, probing pocket depths, and peri-implant marginal bone-level changes. A total of 98 implants were inserted.
Results: During the 1-year follow-up, no implant failure was reported as well as no pain and/or no sinusitis were detected. No other significant events were reported, except for minor soft tissue and technical problems. A maxillary sinus membrane rupture occurred during the surgical phase in 4 (17.4%) patients, but healing was not compromised. Peri-implant mucositis was observed in 2 (8.7%) patients. Twelve months after surgery, average bone loss around conventional implants was 1.11 ± 0.23 mm. In addition, no peri-implant radiolucency was observed around zygomatic implants. Within the limits of this study, preliminary short-term data (1-year after loading) suggested that extrasinus zygomatic implants represent a predictable treatment option for the atrophic maxilla. Further follow-up data (≥5 years) are needed to confirm these results.
Conclusions: The present study supports the conclusion that extrasinus zygomatic implants for the immediate rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla have high success rate with minimal or no complications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.10.003 | DOI Listing |
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am
January 2025
Desert Ridge Oral Surgery Institute, 20950 N Tatum Boulevard #200, Phoenix, AZ 85050, USA; Private Practice of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Banner University Medical Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Guided zygomatic implant placement surgery has emerged as a promising solution for patients with severe maxillary bone loss, offering precise implant placement and predictable outcomes. This article provides a comprehensive review of the current state-of-the-art techniques, advantages, challenges, and future directions in guided zygomatic implant surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Dent
January 2025
Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Orofacial Prosthodontics, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Complutense University of Madrid, Ramon y Cajal Research Institute (IRYCIS). Madrid, Spain. Electronic address:
Objectives: To in-vitro evaluate the feasibility and accuracy (trueness and precision) of various intraoral scanners (IOS) to digitize maxillectomy defect models with exposed zygomatic implants in situ.
Material And Methods: Six partially edentulous and edentulous maxillectomy defect models with 2 zygomatic implants each were obtained. References scans were obatined by using a laboratory scanner (inEos X5; Dentsply Sirona).
Int J Surg Case Rep
January 2025
Department of Prosthodontics, RAK College of Dental Sciences, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates. Electronic address:
Introduction: Rehabilitation of patients with hemimaxillectomy presents a challenge. This case report describes the successful use of zygomatic Corticobasal® implant- supported reconstructed prosthesis.
Clinical Case Presentation: A 20-year-old female patient presented to the clinic following hemimaxillectomy with soft tissue approximation one year ago.
Objective: Evaluate the feasibility of the midface degloving approach (MDA) in total maxillectomy without orbital exenteration (TMWOE) and reconstruction for sino-nasal neoplasms.
Study Design: Retrospective case series.
Setting: Tertiary referral center.
Purpose: This retrospective study aimed to compare extended sinus lift and extramaxilla surgical protocols for restoring severely atrophic maxillae with zygomatic implants (ZIs) and evaluate their clinical effectiveness.
Materials And Methods: The study includes patients who were treated at a dental clinic in Italy from 2012 to 2022. These patients received fixed screw-retained complete dentures supported by either two or four zygomatic implants (ZIs).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!