A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Finite-element analysis of the influence of tibial implant fixation design of total ankle replacement on bone-implant interfacial biomechanical performance. | LitMetric

Purpose: Implant loosening in tibia after primary total ankle replacement (TAR) is one of the common postoperative problems in TAR. Innovations in implant structure design may ideally reduce micromotion at the bone-implant interface and enhance the bone-implant fixation and initial stability, thus eventually prevents long-term implant loosening. This study aimed to investigate (1) biomechanical characteristics at the bone-implant interface and (2) the influence of design features, such as radius, height, and length.

Methods: A total of 101 finite-element models were created based on four commercially available implants. The models predicted micromotion at the bone-implant interface, and we investigated the impact of structural parameters, such as radius, length, and height.

Results: Our results suggested that stem-type implants generally required the highest volume of bone resection before implantation, while peg-type implants required the lowest. Compared with central fixation features (stem and keel), peripherally distributed geometries (bar and peg) were associated with lower initial micromotions. The initial stability of all types of implant design can be optimized by decreasing fixation size, such as reducing the radius of the bars and pegs and lowering the height.

Conclusion: Peg-type tibial implant design may be a promising fixation method, which is required with a minimum bone resection volume and yielded minimum micromotion under an extreme axial loading scenario. Present models can serve as a useful platform to build upon to help physicians or engineers when making incremental improvements related to implant design.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2309499020966125DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bone-implant interface
12
implant design
12
tibial implant
8
total ankle
8
ankle replacement
8
implant loosening
8
micromotion bone-implant
8
initial stability
8
bone resection
8
implant
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!