The Role of 3D Modeling in Education of Orthopedic Trainees for the Treatment of Foot Deformities.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY We hypothesized that preoperative planning with 3D modeling of complex foot deformities would be useful for the education of orthopedics and traumatology residents. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study is prospectively designed study with a control group. Twenty eight residents (study group) who assisted the surgeons during the interventions and ten senior surgeons (control group) were included in the study. All participants assessed virtual 3D-CT images and videos of the cases before the surgery. Ten adult cases of foot bone deformities were evaluated. 3D-CT reconstruction was performed and a 3D model of each deformity was created using the hospital's picture archiving and communication system. The completed 3D models were sterilized in hydrogen peroxide and put on the surgical table in a sterile manner. After surgery, the residents (group I) and surgeons (group II) were questioned regarding their satisfaction with 3D modeling. Responses were structured by a five-point Likert scale (1, strongly disagree; 2, disagree; 3, neither agree nor disagree; 4, agree; and 5, strongly agree). RESULTS The surgeons (group II, n = 10) were satisfied with the sterilized 3D models, which they could touch and re-examine on the operating table. The residents (group I, n = 28) were significantly more satisfied than the senior surgeons (p=0.01). The 3D modeling met both the surgeons' and residents' expectations. DISCUSSION The survey results for the surgeons (group II) were satisfied with the sterilized 3D models, which they could touch and reexamine on the operating table (question 3). They gave the best scores (mean, 4.8/5) for clarity of the 3D model. On the other hand, they gave the lowest scores (mean 3.1/5) to 3D models due to its contribution in understanding deformity over virtual 3D-CT evaluations (question 2 and 5). The residents (group I) differed from those for the senior surgeons. Residents gave the highest scores for understanding of the deformity (question 2 and 5) and clarity (question 1). These outcomes may be interpreted to indicate i) that 3D modeling may be used for education, and ii) that younger surgeons are more interested in novel technological developments. Therefore, the outcomes did differ significantly between the senior surgeons and residents (Table 1). These outcomes may be explicated as; 3D modeling of the foot deformities may not be mandatory for the experienced surgeons for understanding the deformity. On the other hand 3D modeling would be useful tools for younger surgeons and for their education. CONCLUSIONS 3D modeling of foot deformities is more informative than virtual 3D videos. However, with consideration of costs and long processing times, 3D printing may be used optimally for rare deformities. When considering the role of touch sense in surgical learning, 3D modeling gives more detailed and more satisfactory planning than virtual 3D videos. 3D modeling is more useful for young surgeons, and it will be used mainly for education in the future. Key words: 3D printing, deformity, foot and ankle, simulation.