Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This article summarizes the evolution of the screening deck at the Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research (NIBR). Historically, the screening deck was an assembly of all available compounds. In 2015, we designed a first deck to facilitate access to diverse subsets with optimized properties. We allocated the compounds as plated subsets on a 2D grid with property based ranking in one dimension and increasing structural redundancy in the other. The learnings from the 2015 screening deck were applied to the design of a next generation in 2019. We found that using traditional leadlikeness criteria (mainly MW, clogP) reduces the hit rates of attractive chemical starting points in subset screening. Consequently, the 2019 deck relies on solubility and permeability to select preferred compounds. The 2019 design also uses NIBR's experimental assay data and inferred biological activity profiles in addition to structural diversity to define redundancy across the compound sets.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01332 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!