AI Article Synopsis

  • Current guidelines recommend using erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) for managing anemia in patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD), with vadadustat being an investigational oral treatment that boosts erythropoietin production.
  • The PROTECT program consists of two Phase 3 clinical trials comparing the safety and efficacy of vadadustat to darbepoetin alfa in adult patients with anemia due to NDD-CKD, focusing on different patient groups based on their prior ESA treatment status.
  • Both trials assess primary outcomes like changes in hemoglobin levels and major cardiovascular events over defined treatment periods, aiming to provide valuable insights into vadadustat's role in

Article Abstract

Current clinical practice guidelines for anemia management in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) recommend the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) as standard of care. Vadadustat, an investigational oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitor, stimulates endogenous erythropoietin production. The PROTECT program comprises 2 global, Phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, sponsor-blind clinical trials to evaluate safety and efficacy of vadadustat vs darbepoetin alfa in adult patients with anemia associated with NDD-CKD. Patients recruited into the ESA-untreated NDD-CKD trial (N = 1751) had hemoglobin <10 g/dL and had not received an ESA within 8 weeks prior to inclusion in the study. Patients recruited into the ESA-treated NDD-CKD trial (N = 1725) had hemoglobin between 8 and 11 g/dL (US) or 9 and 12 g/dL (non-US) and were actively treated with an ESA for anemia associated with CKD. Trial periods in both trials include (1) correction/conversion (weeks 0-23); (2) maintenance (weeks 24-52); (3) long-term treatment (week 53 to end of treatment); and (4) safety follow-up (end-of-treatment to 4 weeks later). The primary safety endpoint is time to first adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular event, defined as all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke, pooled across both trials. The primary efficacy endpoint in each trial is change in hemoglobin from baseline to primary evaluation period (weeks 24-36), comparing vadadustat vs darbepoetin alfa treatment groups. Demographics and baseline characteristics are similar among patients in both trials and broadly representative of the NDD-CKD population. These trials will help to evaluate the safety and efficacy of vadadustat for management of anemia associated with NDD-CKD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.068DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

safety efficacy
8
efficacy vadadustat
8
cardiovascular safety
4
vadadustat treatment
4
treatment anemia
4
anemia non-dialysis-dependent
4
non-dialysis-dependent ckd
4
ckd design
4
design baseline
4
baseline characteristics
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!