A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Permanent end-colostomy parastomal hernia prevention using a novel three-dimensional mesh. | LitMetric

Permanent end-colostomy parastomal hernia prevention using a novel three-dimensional mesh.

Hernia

Division of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Niguarda General Hospital, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy.

Published: June 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • Prophylactic mesh placement is suggested as a method to reduce the occurrence of parastomal hernias (PSH) after stoma formation in colorectal surgery.
  • An observational study was conducted comparing two groups: one that received mesh prophylaxis and another that did not, with results indicating a significant reduction in PSH development at 12 months for the mesh group (11% vs. 54%).
  • The study concludes that using intraperitoneal mesh is effective in preventing PSH, with no significant differences in long-term complications between the two groups.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Prophylactic mesh placement has been proposed to reduce the high occurrence of parastomal hernia (PSH) after stoma formation.

Methods: This is an observational study comparing two cohorts of patients: a mesh prophylaxis group (who received mesh prevention since introduction at our Institution) and a no mesh prophylaxis group (retrospectively selected from our historical series). Same exclusion criteria were applied for both groups. The study was conducted at a tertiary referral center for colorectal surgery. 43 patients were operated with mesh prophylaxis between May 2015 and may 2019. 45 patients underwent end-colostomy formation without prophylaxis between April 2011 and April 2015. The primary outcome measure was PSH development at 12-month follow up.

Results: Demographic variables and risk factors for PSH were comparable between the two groups. There was no difference between the two cohorts in terms of operative time and main early postoperative outcomes. 37 patients completed the 12-month follow up in each group. PSH occurrence after 12-months was 11% in the mesh prophylaxis group and 54% in the no mesh prophylaxis group (p < 0.0001). There were no differences in long-term complications. 5% of patients who received mesh prophylaxis underwent emergency surgery for bowel occlusion at 7 and 10 months after surgery, with partial or complete mesh removal. At multivariate analysis, mesh prophylaxis was a protective factor for PSH development at 12 months (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Prophylactic intraperitoneal mesh placement appears to be effective in preventing PSH.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02326-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mesh prophylaxis
20
prophylaxis group
16
parastomal hernia
8
mesh
8
12-month follow
8
prophylaxis
6
group
5
permanent end-colostomy
4
end-colostomy parastomal
4
hernia prevention
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!