Objective: Countertransference in forensic inpatient settings has received little empirical attention despite frequent emotional reactions in staff members, such as anger, disgust, or fear. In this exploratory study, we investigated countertransference in two forensic medium-secure units for patients with psychotic disorders.

Method: We measured countertransference using the Therapist Response Questionnaire and measured staff personality using the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Our design allowed all staff members to participate anonymously.

Results: One hundred thirty-four Therapist Response Questionnaire forms, along with data on patient and staff characteristics, were collected. Staff characteristics such as profession, experience, and personality were associated with different countertransference reactions. Psychologists and psychiatrists tended to report more countertransference feelings than nursing staff. Patient and staff variables (such as patient having committed violent offenses or a diagnosis of personality disorder and staff experience or gender) were associated with more negative countertransference feelings and subscale scores as well as less positive countertransference feelings such as parental, protective, and satisfying countertransference feelings. Some patient and staff variables (such as patient cooperativeness, staff personality trait agreeableness) had the inverse effect on countertransference feelings.

Conclusion: We discussed several conceptual problems inherent to measuring countertransference (in forensic inpatient settings) and the clinical implications of our findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000308DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

countertransference forensic
16
countertransference feelings
16
forensic inpatient
12
inpatient settings
12
patient staff
12
countertransference
11
staff
10
patients psychotic
8
staff members
8
therapist response
8

Similar Publications

Clinical and Legal Considerations When Optimizing Trauma Narratives in Immigration Law Evaluations.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law

December 2024

Dr. Franks is an adult psychiatrist in private practice, Boulder, CO. Dr. Ali is a fellow in child and adolescent psychiatry, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA. Dr. Adi is Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. At the time of writing, Dr. Franks and Dr. Ali were psychiatry residents, Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.

Article Synopsis
  • - Asylum seekers in the U.S. must create clear and credible narratives to navigate complex legal processes for immigration relief, often influenced by their traumatic experiences and cultural backgrounds.
  • - The article discusses the importance of a supportive environment and the role of interpreters in helping asylum seekers share their stories, considering cultural factors and the common traumatic events they've endured, like torture or human trafficking.
  • - It also highlights challenges that forensic psychiatric evaluators face in narrative development, such as transference issues, malingering, and the emotional toll on themselves, aiming to offer insights for both therapeutic and legal effectiveness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Forensic Mental Health Evaluators' Unprocessed Emotions as an Often-Overlooked Form of Bias.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law

December 2023

Dr. Goldenson is a Clinical and Forensic Psychologist, University of Toronto, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Gutheil is Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

There has been robust interest in the influence of cognitive and implicit biases that can hamper a forensic mental health evaluator's ability to provide objective opinion evidence. By contrast, literature exploring the biasing effects of the examiner's unacknowledged and unprocessed emotions has been scanty. Borrowing from concepts originating from psychodynamic treatment literature, this article explores how a forensic mental health evaluator's emotional and transferential reactions can affect the assessment process and formulation of findings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

When the Psychiatrist Morally Disapproves.

Psychodyn Psychiatry

March 2023

Department of Psychological Medicine, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore.

The understanding of concepts like moral distress and countertransference in mental health settings has advanced over time. While organizational constraints and the clinician's moral values are conventionally thought to play a part in evoking such responses, certain behavioral transgressions might be universally deemed as morally unacceptable. The authors present case scenarios that took place during forensic assessments and routine clinical care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!