The impact of the shift system on health and quality of life of sleep technicians.

Background: Sleep technicians are at high risk of shift work sleep disorders. We therefore aimed to identify the optimal shift system for sleep technicians.

Methods: We performed a nationwide survey of the work schedules, health and quality of life of sleep technicians using e-mail questionnaires including the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Epworth Sleep Scale (ESS), Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire-10 (FOSQ-10), Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in Korea. A multivariate general linear model was used to assess the effect of shift schedules on health and quality of life.

Results: Fifty-four technicians from 30 sleep laboratories participated. Their work schedules were classified as fixed night (F) (n = 18), slow rotation alternating from a night-only to a day-only schedule with a 3-months to one-year interval (S) (n = 20), rapid rotation within a week (R) (n = 5), night once a week (D+) (n = 5) and day (D) (n = 6). The adjusted ISI and HADS-anxiety scores were higher in F, S, and R than D and D+. Among night shift-dominant schedules, a less favorable profile was observed for R followed by F, and S regarding the ISI, FOSQ-10, mental SF-12 and HADS-depression. The physical SF-12 was lower in the order of R, S and F. The HADS-anxiety score was higher in the order of F, R and S.

Conclusions: The S system appears to have the least negative effect on health and quality of life among night shift-dominant systems. The development of consensus guidelines for scheduling shifts in sleep laboratories is urged.