In vivo 3D tomography of the lumbar spine using a twin robotic X-ray system: quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the lumbar neural foramina in supine and upright position.

Objectives: Supine lumbar spine examinations underestimate body weight effects on neuroforaminal size. Therefore, our purpose was to evaluate size changes of the lumbar neuroforamina using supine and upright 3D tomography and to initially assess image quality compared with computed tomography (CT).

Methods: The lumbar spines were prospectively scanned in 48 patients in upright (3D tomographic twin robotic X-ray) and supine (30 with 3D tomography, 18 with CT) position. Cross-sectional area (CSA), cranio-caudal (CC), and ventro-dorsal (VD) diameters of foramina were measured by two readers and additionally graded in relation to the intervertebral disc height. Visibility of bone/soft tissue structures and image quality were assessed independently on a 5-point Likert scale for the 18 patients scanned with both modalities. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon's signed-rank test (p < 0.05), and interreader reliability were calculated.

Results: Neuroforaminal size significantly decreased at all levels for both readers from the supine (normal intervertebral disc height; CSA 1.25 ± 0.32 cm; CC 1.84 ± 0.24 cm; VD 0.88 ± 0.16 cm) to upright position (CSA 1.12 ± 0.34 cm; CC 1.78 ± 0.24 cm; VD 0.83 ± 0.16 cm; each p < 0.001). Decrease in intervertebral disc height correlated with decrease in foraminal size (supine: CSA 0.88 ± 0.34 cm; CC 1.39 ± 0.33 cm; VD 0.87 ± 0.26 cm; upright: CSA 0.83 ± 0.37 cm, p = 0.010; CC 1.32 ± 0.33 cm, p = 0.015; VD 0.80 ± 0.21 cm, p = 0.021). Interreader reliability for area was fair to excellent (0.51-0.89) with a wide range for cranio-caudal (0.32-0.74) and ventro-dorsal (0.03-0.70) distances. Image quality was superior for CT compared with that for 3D tomography (p < 0.001; κ, CT = 0.66-0.92/3D tomography = 0.51-1.00).

Conclusions: The size of the lumbar foramina is smaller in the upright weight-bearing position compared with that in the supine position. Image quality, especially nerve root delineation, is inferior using 3D tomography compared to CT.

Key Points: • Weight-bearing examination demonstrates a decrease of the neuroforaminal size. • Patients with higher decrease in intervertebral disc showed a narrower foraminal size. • Image quality is superior with CT compared to 3D tomographic twin robotic X-ray at the lumbar spine.