AI Article Synopsis

  • Lung cancer requires accurate mediastinal staging for better prognosis and surgical planning, with EBUS-TBNA emerging as a less invasive procedure compared to traditional mediastinoscopy.* -
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of EBUS-TBNA versus mediastinoscopy in staging lymph nodes for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), involving five studies and 532 patients.* -
  • Results showed that both procedures had similar accuracy (EBUS-TBNA sensitivity at 81% and mediastinoscopy at 75%), and while mediastinoscopy experienced slightly more complications, the differences were not statistically significant, suggesting EBUS-TBNA can be preferred for staging.*

Article Abstract

Objective: Lung cancer (LC) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Accurate mediastinal staging is mandatory in order to assess prognosis and to select patients for surgical treatment. EBUS-TBNA is a minimally invasive procedure that allows sampling of mediastinal lymph nodes (LNs). Some studies have suggested that EBUS-TBNA is preferable to surgical mediastinoscopy for mediastinal staging of LC. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare EBUS-TBNA and mediastinoscopy in terms of their effectiveness for mediastinal LN staging in potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis, in which we searched various databases. We included studies comparing the accuracy of EBUS-TBNA with that of mediastinoscopy for mediastinal LN staging in patients with NSCLC. In the meta-analysis, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios, and negative likelihood ratios. We also analyzed the risk difference for the reported complications associated with each procedure.

Results: The search identified 4,201 articles, 5 of which (with a combined total of 532 patients) were selected for inclusion in the meta-analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between EBUS-TBNA and mediastinoscopy in terms of the sensitivity (81% vs. 75%), specificity (100% for both), positive likelihood ratio (101.03 vs. 95.70), or negative likelihood ratio (0.21 vs. 0.23). The area under the summary ROC curve was 0.9881 and 0.9895 for EBUS-TBNA and mediastinoscopy, respectively. Although the number of complications was higher for mediastinoscopy, the difference was not significant (risk difference: -0.03; 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.01; I2 = 76%).

Conclusions: EBUS-TBNA and mediastinoscopy produced similar results for mediastinal staging of NSCLC. EBUS-TBNA can be the procedure of first choice for LN staging in patients with NSCLC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20190221DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mediastinal staging
20
ebus-tbna mediastinoscopy
20
mediastinoscopy mediastinal
12
lung cancer
12
systematic review
12
review meta-analysis
12
ebus-tbna
9
mediastinoscopy
8
surgical mediastinoscopy
8
mediastinal lymph
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!