AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigates whether life-sustaining treatment orders align better with patient preferences in nursing facility residents using POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) forms compared to those without these forms.
  • - Results indicate that residents with POLST forms have a significantly higher concordance rate (59.3%) between treatment orders and their current preferences than those without (34.9%).
  • - The odds of having matching orders are over three times greater for residents with POLST, highlighting the effectiveness of POLST in ensuring patients' wishes are respected in medical care decisions.

Article Abstract

Background: It is essential to high-quality medical care that life-sustaining treatment orders match the current, values-based preferences of patients or their surrogate decision-makers. It is unknown whether concordance between orders and current preferences is higher when a POLST form is used compared to standard documentation practices.

Objective: To assess concordance between existing orders and current preferences for nursing facility residents with and without POLST forms.

Design: Chart review and interviews.

Setting: Forty Indiana nursing facilities (29 where POLST is used and 11 where POLST is not in use).

Participants: One hundred sixty-one residents able to provide consent and 197 surrogate decision-makers of incapacitated residents with and without POLST forms.

Main Measurements: Concordance was measured by comparing life-sustaining treatment orders in the medical record (e.g., orders about resuscitation, intubation, and hospitalization) with current preferences. Concordance was analyzed using population-averaged binary logistic regression. Inverse probability weighting techniques were used to account for non-response. We hypothesized that concordance would be higher in residents with POLST (n = 275) in comparison to residents without POLST (n = 83).

Key Results: Concordance was higher for residents with POLST than without POLST (59.3% versus 34.9%). In a model adjusted for resident, surrogate, and facility characteristics, the odds were 3.05 times higher that residents with POLST had orders for life-sustaining treatment match current preferences in comparison to residents without POLST (OR 3.05 95% CI 1.67-5.58, p < 0.001). No other variables were significantly associated with concordance.

Conclusions: Nursing facility residents with POLST are significantly more likely than residents without POLST to have concordance between orders in their medical records and current preferences for life-sustaining treatments, increasing the likelihood that their treatment preferences will be known and honored. However, findings indicate further systems change and clinical training are needed to improve POLST concordance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878602PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06292-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

residents polst
36
current preferences
20
life-sustaining treatment
16
polst
15
treatment orders
12
higher residents
12
residents
10
orders
8
orders match
8
match current
8

Similar Publications

Background: National POLST guidance indicates POLST is intended for individuals at risk of life-threatening clinical events due to serious illness. Even though this patient population includes many, but not all, nursing facility residents, there is evidence that POLST is used broadly in this setting. This study aimed to identify clinician perspectives regarding factors that influence their decision-making about whether to use POLST with nursing facility residents and to distinguish between inappropriate and appropriate use.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Relationship of POLST to Hospitalization and ICU Care Among Nursing Home Residents in California.

J Gen Intern Med

December 2023

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Background: Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) document instructions for intensity of care based upon patient care preferences. POLST forms generally reflect patients' wishes and dictate subsequent medical care, but it is not known how POLST use and content among nursing home residents is associated with inpatient utilization across a large population.

Objective: Evaluate the relationship between POLST use and content with hospital utilization among nursing home residents in California.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Changes over time in POLST use and content by race and ethnicity among California nursing home residents.

J Am Geriatr Soc

September 2023

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Background: Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) are commonly used for nursing home (NH) residents. Treatment orders differ across race and ethnicity, presumably related to cultural and socioeconomic variation and levels of access to care and trust. Because national efforts focus on addressing the underpinnings of racial and ethnic differences in treatment (i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: POLST orders are actionable in an emergency, so it is important that the decisions be of high quality and concordant with current preferences. The goal of this study is to determine the relationship between concordance and decision quality outcomes, including decision satisfaction and decisional conflict, among nursing facility residents and surrogates who recall POLST.

Methods: We completed structured interviews in 29 nursing facilities with 275 participants who had previously signed a POLST form.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Experience and perspectives of end-of-life care discussion and physician orders for life-sustaining treatment of Korea (POLST-K): a cross-sectional study.

BMC Med Ethics

March 2023

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan University College of Medicine, 877, Bangeojinsunhwando-ro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, 44033, Republic of Korea.

Background: This study aimed to identify the healthcare providers' experience and perspectives toward end-of-life care decisions focusing on end-of-life discussion and physician's order of life-sustaining treatment documentation in Korea which are major parts of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Act.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a questionnaire developed by the authors. A total of 474 subjects-94 attending physicians, 87 resident physicians, and 293 nurses-participated in the survey, and the data analysis was performed in terms of frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation using the SPSS 24.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!