Background: Recent literature has suggested some benefits for neuraxial anesthesia (NA) as an alternative for general anesthesia (GA) for primary total hip arthroplasty patients. We examined the impact of NA vs GA on outcomes for patients undergoing direct anterior (DA) approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) in an institution with established rapid recovery protocols.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted for 500 consecutive THA patients from a single institution. Univariate analysis and multivariate linear regression were used to compare outcomes for THA patients receiving NA and GA.

Results: There was a significant difference in length of stay with NA patients having a shorter length of stay (NA 32.7 hours vs GA 38.1 hours, P = .003). Patients receiving NA had significantly lower PACU morphine milligram equivalents (MME) (NA 10.2 MME vs GA 15.6 MME, P < .001) and reported a lower score on the PACU pain numeric rating scale (NA 2.1 vs GA 3.7, P < .001).

Conclusion: Neuraxial anesthesia is associated with decreased LOS, decreased PACU MME, and a lower PACU pain score for patients undergoing primary DA THA. These trends remained consistent when controlling for age, gender, BMI, and ASA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536536PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.09.050DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

neuraxial anesthesia
12
total hip
12
hip arthroplasty
12
length stay
12
direct anterior
8
anterior approach
8
approach total
8
patients undergoing
8
tha patients
8
patients receiving
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!