Background And Purpose: Use of problem-based learning (PBL) in health professions education has limited data supporting improved exam performance and confidence in problem solving, primarily within courses converted to a PBL format. This study aimed to demonstrate a similar benefit in simultaneous and subsequent required, non-PBL courses that involved critical thinking.
Educational Activity And Setting: This retrospective cohort study included students who were enrolled in the pharmacotherapeutics and case studies/laboratory course sequences in the second and third professional (P3) years. We compared performance across both course sequences of students who took a PBL elective course in the fall of the P3 year (PBL students) and students who did not take the elective course (non-PBL students).
Findings: There was a statistically significant difference favoring PBL students in performance in both the therapeutics and case/lab courses offered simultaneously with the PBL elective. There was no significant difference noted between PBL and non-PBL student performance in the subsequent therapeutics and case/lab courses; however, results within individual cohorts differed strikingly from the aggregate analysis. Performance in the PBL elective had no impact on the outcomes of the study.
Summary: This study demonstrated an overall benefit for students who participated in a PBL course on performance in simultaneous, critical thinking courses that did not incorporate PBL. However, the aggregate did not show a difference in performance in subsequent critical thinking, non-PBL courses. Further studies are needed to elucidate the true benefit of the PBL approach in other non-PBL courses that require advanced clinical reasoning.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.07.015 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!