AI Article Synopsis

  • Epiphora, or excessive tearing, affects about 6% of U.S. infants and is often caused by congenital issues in the nasolacrimal duct, leading to congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO), requiring surgical probing when conservative methods fail.
  • This systematic review analyzed 11 studies to evaluate the effectiveness of combining nasal endoscopy with traditional nasolacrimal duct probing, identifying a success rate of 95.3% with endoscopy compared to 75.3% without.
  • Despite promising results for combined methods, the review noted significant biases and inconsistencies in the studies, indicating a need for more reliable data on patient outcomes.

Article Abstract

Objectives: Epiphora is a common presenting complaint in infants affecting up to 6% of infants in the United States. It is most frequently due to congenital anomalies of the nasolacrimal duct system, termed congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO). Nasolacrimal duct probing is widely accepted as the primary surgical intervention in cases that fail conservative management. Recently, nasal endoscopy has been combined with traditional probing to improve success rates and outcomes. Several studies have been conducted, but the results have been inconclusive overall. The goal of this systematic review is to examine the existing literature on the role of nasal endoscopy during nasolacrimal duct probing and evaluate patient outcomes.

Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, LILAC, and EMBASE to identify peer-reviewed research. Eligible studies were those containing original peer-reviewed research in English addressing nasolacrimal duct probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in conjunction with nasal endoscopy. Two investigators independently reviewed all articles and extracted data. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool, the Newcastle-Ottawa Assessment scale, and the NIH Quality Assessment scale.

Results: A literature review ultimately yielded 11 articles that were selected and included in our analysis. Of the seven case series, the success rate was 92.5% for a total of 492 eyes. Of the four cohort/case-control studies, the success rate in conventional probings was 75.3% for a total of 293 eyes. In probings with nasal endoscopy, the success rate was 95.3% for 162 eyes. Overall, there was a high risk of bias and variation in data reporting amongst studies.

Conclusion: Infants with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction that does not resolve with conservative treatment often require surgical intervention. Based on this systematic review of the current literature, nasal endoscopy is a useful adjunct for nasolacrimal duct probing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110448DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nasolacrimal duct
36
nasal endoscopy
20
congenital nasolacrimal
16
duct obstruction
16
duct probing
16
systematic review
12
success rate
12
nasolacrimal
9
duct
9
surgical intervention
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!