Theleadless pacemaker (LLPM) therapy has been developed in recent years to overcome the transvenous lead and device pocket-related complications. The LLPMs now available are self-contained right ventricular pacemakers and are limited to single-chamber ventricular pacing modality. This literature review deals with the current status of LLPM technology and current areas of clinical applicability. The safety and efficacy outcomes published from randomized clinical trials and real world registries are analyzed and compared with historical conventional transvenous pacemaker data. Furthermore, new pacing modalities and future perspectives to broaden the clinical use and cover most of pacing indications are discussed. Due to the overall safe and effective profile in the short term and intermediate term, also in fragile patients, the LLPM use is constantly growing in daily clinical practice. Actually, it can be considered a landmark innovation, through which a new era of cardiac pacing has begun.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14097 | DOI Listing |
Heliyon
January 2025
Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Balamand, Kalhat, Lebanon.
Background: Transvenous pacemakers (TVP) and leadless pacemakers (LP) are two reliable permanent modalities for the treatment of heart rhythm disorders. Several observational studies explored the safety and efficacy of the two devices. The aim of this meta-analysis study is to present a comparative analysis of the safety of leadless versus transvenous pacemakers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHeart Rhythm O2
December 2024
Department of Internal Medicine, Burnett School of Medicine at Texas Christian University (TCU) and Consultants in Cardiovascular Medicine and Science, Fort Worth, Texas.
Background: The adoption of leadless pacemakers (LPMs) is increasing, yet the impact of body mass index (BMI) on procedural outcomes remains underexplored.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of BMI on in-hospital outcomes for patients receiving LPM implantation.
Methods: Data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2018-2021 were analyzed for patients older than 18 years who underwent LPM implantation, with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria applied.
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag
December 2024
Department of Electrophysiology, MedStar Health: Heart and Vascular Institute at MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Leadless pacemakers (LPs) are emerging options for bradyarrhythmias. However, extraction can be risky if the device is in an unfavorable position. We present a challenging case of a Nanostim LP (NLP) (Abbott Medical Inc.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Heart J Case Rep
January 2025
AL Qassimi Hospital, Emirates Health Services (EHS), Wasit Street-Al khazamiya, Sharjah 3500, United Arab Emirates.
Background: The use of single-chamber, right ventricular (RV) leadless pacemakers (LPs) has been well established, the introduction of a right atrial LPs has opened the door for dual-chamber leadless pacing. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) segmentation integration might provide proper visual guide during the procedure.
Case Summary: A 58-year-old male patient was brought to the emergency department with dizziness and complete heart block.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol
December 2024
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address:
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!