AI Article Synopsis

  • High resolution ultrasonography (USG) is used to evaluate thyroid nodules, with the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) providing risk classification that guides further testing like fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC).
  • The study observed 137 euthyroid nodules, comparing USG findings and FNAC results to surgical biopsy outcomes, revealing that FNAC is more specific for diagnosing malignancy (90% specificity) compared to TIRADS.
  • Key features from USG, such as micro-calcifications, irregular margins, and shape, were identified as highly sensitive and specific indicators of malignancy, although some benign cases could still show suspicious USG features.

Article Abstract

Background: High resolution ultrasonography (USG) is the first-line investigation in evaluation of euthyroid nodules. Thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TIRADS) is an USG-based risk stratification system for classifying thyroid nodules. Subjects with high-risk category of TIRADS undergo fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and FNAC findings are reported according to Bethesda classification. Bethesda categories are used for determining risk of malignancy. Data regarding sonographic classification of thyroid nodule and its cytological association with respect to final histopathological diagnosis remains scarcely available in India.

Aims And Objective: The study evaluated euthyroid nodules for risk of malignancy and compared sonographic features and FNAC (Bethesda classification) findings with histopathology of excised samples.

Material And Methods: This was a single-center observational study on 137 consecutive subjects of solitary euthyroid nodule. All subjects underwent USG according to TIRADS and FNAC where applicable. Surgical biopsy report was used as a gold standard.

Results: The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive and negative predictive value of FNAC were 80%, 90%, 85%, 86%, and 86.6% and TIRADS were 80%, 47.2% 61%, 51.3%, and 77.3%, respectively. FNAC classification was equally sensitive and more specific than TIRADS. Among individual USG parameters, micro-calcification was most sensitive (80%) and specific (86%). Irregular margin and taller-than-wider shape had a specificity of 89% and 92%, respectively. 3 patients (14.28%) with benign cytology and suspicious USG features (specifically TIRADS 4 & 5) undergoing surgery had malignancy in final HPE.

Conclusions: USG and FNAC are equally sensitive in diagnosing malignant thyroid nodule but FNA is more specific (90%). It's a minimally invasive method which can be used to distinguish malignant from benign lesions with a high degree of accuracy (85%). In patient having high risk feature on USG, a benign cytology needs to be repeat FNAC and they should undergo surgical biopsy for confirmation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540823PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_349_20DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

thyroid nodule
12
sonographic features
8
fine needle
8
needle aspiration
8
aspiration cytology
8
euthyroid nodules
8
fnac
8
bethesda classification
8
risk malignancy
8
surgical biopsy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!