A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Antibacterial property of , , and against oral microbes. | LitMetric

Antibacterial property of , , and against oral microbes.

J Conserv Dent

Department of Oral Pathology, Regional Dental College, Guwahati, Assam, India.

Published: August 2020

Context: Plant extracts are used in folklore medicine from time immemorial to treat different oral diseases. Chemical constituents extracted from these natural resources are gifted with huge opportunities.

Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the antibacterial property of (Neem), (Tulsi), and (Pochotia) against oral microorganisms.

Materials And Methods: Plant extract was prepared with hot continuous extraction method by the Soxhlet Apparatus. Microorganisms isolated from the oral cavity and identified by Vitek-2. Bacterial inoculums poured and spread into Mueller Hinton plates. Plant extract was poured into prepared wells taking ciprofloxacillin as the positive control and dimethyl sulfoxide as the negative control. The experiment was performed in duplicates with two different concentrations of the extract and mean value of inhibition zone was calculated.

Statistical Analysis: Paired -test, analysis of variance, and regression analysis.

Results: Isolated microorganisms were , and . Higher zone of inhibition was observed against by followed by . Among the aqueous and acetone group, in the aqueous group, the regression models of and have been found to be statistically significant (= < 0.05), whereas, in the acetone group, the regression model of has been found to be statistically significant ( = < 0.05).

Conclusion: All the three plants showed antibacterial potency against the isolated organisms. Acetone group showed better efficacy than the aqueous extract group.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542067PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_268_19DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acetone group
12
antibacterial property
8
plant extract
8
group regression
8
group
5
oral
4
property oral
4
oral microbes
4
microbes context
4
context plant
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!