Clinical Relevance of Unexpected Findings of Post-Mortem Computed Tomography in Hospitalized Patients: An Observational Study.

Int J Environ Res Public Health

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht UMC, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Published: October 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study analyzes unexpected findings from post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) in hospitalized patients, emphasizing their importance alongside the primary cause of death.
  • Of the 120 decedents evaluated, 302 unexpected findings were identified via PMCT, with 24 of these classified as clinically relevant after comparison with autopsy results.
  • The research highlights that many clinically relevant findings were missed by autopsy alone, suggesting that combining PMCT with traditional autopsy could improve clinical evaluations.

Article Abstract

The current literature describing the use of minimally invasive autopsy in clinical care is mainly focused on the cause of death. However, the identification of unexpected findings is equally important for the evaluation and improvement of daily clinical care. The purpose of this study was to analyze unexpected post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) findings of hospitalized patients and assess their clinical relevance. This observational study included patients admitted to the internal medicine ward. Consent for PMCT and autopsy was requested from the next of kin. Decedents were included when consent for at least PMCT was obtained. Consent for autopsy was not obtained for all decedents. All findings reported by PMCT were coded with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code. Unexpected findings were identified and subsequently categorized for their clinical relevance by the Goldman classification. Goldman class I and III were considered clinically relevant. Additionally, correlation with autopsy results and ante-mortem imaging was performed. : In total, 120 decedents were included and evaluated for unexpected findings on PMCT. Of them, 57 decedents also underwent an autopsy. A total of 1020 findings were identified; 111 correlated with the cause of death (10.9%), 508 were previously reported (49.8%), 99 were interpreted as post-mortem changes (9.7%), and 302 were classified as unexpected findings (29.6%). After correlation with autopsy (in 57 decedents), 24 clinically relevant unexpected findings remained. These findings were reported in 18 of 57 decedents (32%). Interestingly, 25% of all unexpected findings were not reported by autopsy. Many unexpected findings are reported by PMCT in hospitalized patients, a substantial portion of which is clinically relevant. Additionally, PMCT is able to identify pathology and injuries not reported by conventional autopsy. A combination of PMCT and autopsy can thus be considered a more comprehensive and complete post-mortem examination.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7589901PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207572DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

unexpected findings
32
findings reported
16
clinical relevance
12
findings
12
hospitalized patients
12
clinically relevant
12
unexpected
9
autopsy
9
post-mortem computed
8
computed tomography
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!