Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: Some atypical vertebral hemangiomas (VHs) may mimic metastases on routine MRI and can result in misdiagnosis and ultimately to additional imaging, biopsy and unnecessary costs. The purpose of this study is to assess the utility of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on account of field-of-view optimized and constrained undistorted single shot (FOCUS) in distinguishing atypical VHs and vertebral metastases.
Methods: A total of 25 patients with vertebral metastases and 25 patients with atypical VHs were confirmed by clinical follow-up or pathology. IVIM-DWI imaging was performed at different b values (0, 30, 50, 100, 150, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000 mm/s). IVIM parameters [the true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and perfusion fraction (f)] were calculated and compared between two groups by using Student's t test. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed.
Results: Quantitative analysis of standard ADC and D parameters showed significantly lower values in vertebral metastases when compared to atypical hemangiomas [ADC value: (0.70 ± 0.12) × 10 mm/s vs (1.14 ± 0.28) × 10 mm/s; D value: (0.47 ± 0.07) × 10 mm/s vs (0.76 ± 0.14) × 10 mm/s, all P < 0.01]. The sensitivity and specificity of D value were 93.8% and 92.3%, respectively.
Conclusion: The standard ADC value and D value may be used as an indicator to distinguish vertebral metastases from atypical VHs. FOCUS IVIM-derived parameters provide potential value in the quantitatively differentiating vertebral metastases from vertebral atypical hemangiomas.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06632-z | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!