A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Prevalence of ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) and in sheep at El Huda and El Nuhud animals production research stations, Sudan. | LitMetric

A cross-sectional study was performed 200 blood samples and 314 tick samples in El Huda and El Nuhud animals production research stations, Sudan, in May (summer) and December (winter) in 2016, to determine the prevalence of in sheep and the potential risk factors associated with the infection. A total of 200 blood samples and 314 tick samples were collected from El Huda (n = 103 blood, 97 tick) and El Nuhud (n = 97 blood, 217 tick) stations. Data on the risk factors, such as age, sex, ecotype of sheep, body condition score and seasons were recorded. The overall prevalence of was 13% (26/200) using PCR. A significant variation in the prevalence of was observed between the stations and the ecotype of sheep ( ≤ 0.05), whereas the highest prevalence was recorded in El-Huda station (19.4%) as well as in Shugor (22.8%). Other risk factors, like age, sex, body condition, and seasons were not found to be significantly associated with infection. However, the highest prevalence rate was recorded in old animals (21.6%) than the other, in males (17.9%) than females (12.2%), in animals with poor body condition (26.1%) than the other, and in winter (16%) than summer (10%). Four tick species i.e. (63.1%), (13.8%), (8.8%), and (14.3%) were recorded in El Nuhud station. While in El Huda station, only (79.4%), (20.6%) were recorded. This study revealed that 13% of sheep were suffering from which is a considerable number at the stations. Therefore, further epidemiological investigations on disease throughout the year are required in order to set a well-coordinated control program.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7552582PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12639-020-01284-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risk factors
12
body condition
12
huda nuhud
8
nuhud animals
8
animals production
8
production stations
8
stations sudan
8
200 blood
8
blood samples
8
samples 314
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!