Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7768553 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmgh.2020.09.018 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Factors associated with COVID-19 misinformation rebuttal among college students: a descriptive study.
Front Public Health
December 2023
School of Languages and Cultures, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Background: The deluge of COVID-19 misinformation makes people confused, and acting on such misinformation can kill, leading to the tragic outcome of death. This makes it necessary to identify significant factors associated with college students' susceptibility.
Objective: This descriptive study sought to ascertain factors significantly associated with college students' susceptibility to online COVID-19 misinformation.
Basic emotions do not reliably co-occur with predicted facial expressions: Reply to Witkower et al. (2023).
Emotion
April 2023
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Article Synopsis
- * Their analysis revealed that only 13% of instances showed a reliable co-occurrence between the conscious experience of an emotion and the corresponding facial expression, even rising to 23% when partial facial signals were considered.
- * Witkower et al.'s defense of Basic Emotion Theory was dismissed by the authors, who argue that their findings represent a significant challenge to the theory, highlighting a misunderstanding in correlating emotional expressions and experiences with different psychological phenomena.
Rebuttal to Douglas and Elliott.
J Gen Philos Sci
May 2022
Department of Philosophy, University of Saskatchewan, 9 Campus Drive, S7N 5A5 Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada.
In "Should We Strive to Make Science Bias‑Free? A Philosophical Assessment of the Reproducibility Crisis", I argue that the problem of bias in science, a key factor in the current reproducibility crisis, is worsened if we follow Heather Douglas and Kevin C. Elliott's advice and introduce non-epistemic values into the evidential assessment of scientific hypotheses. In their response to my paper, Douglas and Elliott complain that I misrepresent their views and fall victim to various confusions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRebuttal to: Confusion on Cell Fusion.
Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol
July 2021
Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address:
Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behaviour measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
March 2016
Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Institute for Sport, Physical Education and Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Background: The measurement of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) is fundamental to health related research, policy, and practice but there are well known challenges to these measurements. Within the academic literature, the terms "validity" and "reliability" are frequently used when discussing PA and SB measurement to reassure the reader that they can trust the evidence.
Discussion: In this paper we argue that a lack of consensus about the best way to define, assess, or utilize the concepts of validity and reliability has led to inconsistencies and confusion within the PA and SB evidence base.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!