Hock-a-loogie saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 by a PCR-based assay: A diagnostic validity study.

Clin Chim Acta

Department of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China; Key Laboratory of Clinical In Vitro Diagnostic Techniques of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, PR China; Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China; State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China. Electronic address:

Published: December 2020

To clarify the effect of different respiratory sample types on SARS-CoV-2 detection, we collected throat swabs, nasal swabs and hock-a-loogie saliva or sputum, and compared their detection rates and viral loads. The detection rates of sputum (95.65%, 22/23) and hock-a-loogie saliva (88.09%, 37/42) were significantly higher than those in throat swabs (41.54%, 27/65) and nasal swabs (72.31%, 47/65) (P < 0.001). The Ct Values of sputum, hock-a-loogie saliva and nasal swabs were significantly higher than that in throat swabs, whereas no significant difference was observed between sputum and saliva samples. Hock-a-loogie saliva are reliable sample types that can be used to detect SARS-CoV-2, and worthy of clinical promotion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7557199PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hock-a-loogie saliva
12
throat swabs
8
nasal swabs
8
detection rates
8
saliva diagnostic
4
diagnostic specimen
4
specimen sars-cov-2
4
sars-cov-2 pcr-based
4
pcr-based assay
4
assay diagnostic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!