We assessed the effect of a daytime sleep opportunity on planning and risk-related decision-making in emerging adults using multiple neurobehavioral assessments. A total of 136 healthy emerging adults (20.0 ± 1.5 years), 65% female, performed the Risky-Gains Task and the Tower of London test twice. Between these assessments, they were randomized to either have a sleep opportunity monitored by polysomnography (Sleep group, n = 101) or to stay awake (Wake group, n = 35). During Test 2, in comparison to the Sleep group, the Wake group showed increased sleepiness, worse planning ability and more decrease in reaction times when selecting risky choices. Changes in Tower of London test steps used and Risky-Gains Task response time correlated with the number of central and frontal fast sleep spindles, respectively. These results indicate that among emerging adults who commonly have poor sleep patterns, a daytime sleep opportunity was related to better planning ability, better psychomotor vigilance and stable response speeds in risk-related decision-making. Changes in planning and risk-related decision-making correlated with the number of sleep spindles during the nap, supporting a specific role for sleep in modulating planning and potentially other higher-order cognitive functions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745149PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa140DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risk-related decision-making
16
emerging adults
16
daytime sleep
12
planning risk-related
12
sleep opportunity
12
sleep
10
decision-making emerging
8
risky-gains task
8
tower london
8
london test
8

Similar Publications

Objective: Patient reported measures of hospital care are known predictors of readmission, even after accounting for risk related to age and comorbidities. This study aimed to determine the association between patient experience of diabetes-related foot disease (DFD) hospital care and unplanned hospital readmission, with a primary focus on DFD-related readmissions and a secondary focus on all-cause readmissions.

Methods: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted by linking NSW Adult Admitted Patient Survey data with administrative hospital data for persons hospitalised with DFD identified through diagnostic and/or procedure codes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Risk is a fundamental factor affecting individual and social economic decisions, but its neural correlates are largely unexplored in the social domain. The amygdala, together with the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), is thought to play a central role in risk taking. Here, we investigated in human volunteers (n=20; 11 females) how risk (defined as variance of reward probability distributions) in a social situation affects decisions and concomitant neural activity as measured with fMRI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The 11+ is a structured warm-up program designed to prevent injuries in soccer players, but has proven efficacy in many populations, settings and sports. It consists of 15 exercises that target the most common injury sites, such as the knee, ankle, and groin. However, the implementation and adherence of the 11+ remain suboptimal, and recent compelling data indicates underlying mechanisms of injury risk related to neural control of movement may not be adequately targeted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • ADHD and substance use disorders are linked to increased impulsivity and lower brain activity in specific areas, namely the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and nucleus accumbens (NAc).
  • Researchers studied how these brain regions interact with impulsive behaviors using two types of rats: high-impulsive (RHA) and low-impulsive (RLA), measuring their brain activity and behaviors.
  • Findings revealed that activating the mPFC-NAc pathway reduced motor impulsivity in high-impulsive rats, while inhibiting it had no effect on low-impulsive rats, indicating the pathway's role is more significant in motor impulsivity than in risk-related decision-making.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Presurgical blood orders are important for patient safety during surgery, but excess orders can be costly to patients and the healthcare system. We aimed to assess clinician perceptions on the presurgical blood ordering process and perceived barriers to reliable decision-making.

Methods: This descriptive qualitative study was conducted at a single large academic medical center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!