Compared with drugs from the blockbuster era, recently authorized drugs and those expected in the future present a heterogenous mix of chemicals, biologicals, and cell and gene therapies, a sizable fraction being for rare diseases, and even individualized treatments or individualized combinations. The shift in the nature of products entails secular trends for the definitions of "drugs" and "target population" and for clinical use and evidence generation. We discuss that the lessons learned from evidence generation for 20th century medicines may have limited relevance for 21st century medicines. We explain why the future is not about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) vs. real-world evidence (RWE) but RCTs and RWE-not just for the assessment of safety but also of effectiveness. Finally, we highlight that, in the era of precision medicine, we may not be able to reliably describe some small treatment effects-either by way of RCTs or RWE.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8246742PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2083DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

randomized controlled
8
controlled trials
8
evidence generation
8
century medicines
8
trials versus
4
versus real
4
evidence
4
real evidence
4
evidence magic
4
magic myth
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!