Introduction A wide breast footprint is a common complaint expressed by breast reconstruction patients following abdominally-based autologous breast reconstruction. Our aim is to describe the lateral autologous breast sling, a novel technique, which modifies the lateral flap inset to address this common patient complaint. Methods A review of consecutive women who underwent the lateral autologous breast flap sling procedure over a four-year period was completed. Patient demographics, oncologic treatment, operative interventions, surgical indications, and complications were evaluated. Results Fourteen patients underwent 21 lateral autologous breast flap sling procedures with a mean follow-up of 18 months. Eleven patients underwent delayed breast reconstruction while three were completed immediately, including one patient who had concurrent unilateral mastectomy, free tissue transfer, and a lateral breast sling procedure. Revision surgery was sought for breast asymmetry, excessive lateral breast tissue, and poor superior pole volume. Simultaneous revision procedures were performed in 12 patients and included fat grafting, abdominal donor site revision, contralateral breast reduction, and V to Y advancement of the lateral breast/ chest soft tissues. Reconstruction was complete in 10 patients, with an average duration of 13.5 months and four reconstructive procedures. There were no major perioperative complications. Three patients developed fat necrosis following lipofilling and two of these patients required drainage and/or excision of fat necrosis. Conclusions The lateral autologous breast flap sling technique adds to the armamentarium for narrowing the wide breast and improving the lateral breast curve. It may be performed in combination with other revision procedures. The use of this technique is associated with a low complication rate and does not significantly increase the total number of reconstructive procedures or duration of reconstruction. This technique may be useful during initial free tissue transfer.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7546595 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10323 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Surg Oncol
January 2025
Division of Breast Surgery, General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taipei and Taoyuan City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of robotic mastectomy (RM) and conventional mastectomy (CM) for breast cancer.
Methods: Our institutional registry of women with breast cancer who received RM between 2018 and 2023 and CM between 2016 and 2023 were reviewed. Propensity score matching of clinicopathological variables was used to match 123 RM patients with 123 CM patients.
J Craniofac Surg
January 2025
Department of Plastic Surgery, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Henan University of Chinese Medicine (Zhengzhou People's Hospital).
Introduction: The strategy of adipose component transplantation has been proposed and widely used in both reconstructive and aesthetic surgery. However, there is no uniform standard for the preparation of component fat, and the volume calculation of liposuction and injection in clinical applications is mostly based on experience. This study aims to analyze the volume of component fat obtained during clinical series.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlast Surg (Oakv)
February 2025
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Opioid dependence can occur in 6% to 10% of patients undergoing breast reconstruction. With the expansion of interdisciplinary initiatives to decrease opioid use after surgery, an updated look at the incidence of and risk factors for prolonged opioid dependence after free flap breast reconstruction is essential. We retrospectively identified all cases of free flap breast reconstruction completed at our institution from 2017 to 2020.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlast Reconstr Surg
January 2025
Department of General Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
The single port robotic nipple sparing mastectomy (SPrNSM) was recently introduced. This approach is safe and has led to favorable outcomes in relation to cosmetic result, patient satisfaction, and breast sensation. The typical reconstruction with all robotic nipple sparing mastectomies is implant based; however, this is not always what a patient desires.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlast Reconstr Surg
February 2025
From the Department of Plastic Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine.
Background: Cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-assisted lipotransfer have been used to overcome the low survival rate of conventional lipotransfer. However, there is still insufficient evidence to determine which technique is the best strategy for autologous fat grafting in breast cosmetic and reconstructive surgery. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of traditional fat transplantation, CAL, and PRP-assisted lipotransfer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!