AI Article Synopsis

  • * A study involving 239 patients validated the FHNSI-10 and FHNSI-7, showing good internal consistency and reliability, and demonstrated their potential use in evaluating patient-reported symptoms.
  • * The findings suggest that while these symptom indexes correlate with patients' performance status and survival outcomes, changes in symptom scores do not necessarily reflect changes in performance status over a short period.

Article Abstract

Background: Patients with advanced head and neck cancer have identified pain, fatigue, and difficulties swallowing, breathing, and communicating as high-priority disease-related symptoms. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck Symptom Index-10 (FHNSI-10) assesses these symptoms. We sought to validate the FHNSI-10, another brief symptom index (FHNSI-7), and individual symptom endpoints representing these high-rated priority disease symptoms among patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

Methods: Patients (N = 239) were enrolled in a phase III randomized clinical trial (E1302) and completed the FHNSI-10 at multiple time points. We assessed the internal consistencies and test-retest reliabilities of the FHNSI-10 and FHNSI-7 scores, and the known-groups validity, predictive criterion validity, and responsiveness-to-change of the symptom indexes and individual symptom endpoint scores.

Results: The FHNSI-10 and FHNSI-7 indexes showed satisfactory internal consistencies (Cronbach's alpha coefficient range 0.60-0.75) and acceptable test-retest reliabilities (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.75 and 0.74, respectively). The FHNSI-10, FHNSI-7, and the pain, fatigue, swallowing, and breathing symptom scores showed evidence of known-groups validity by performance status at baseline. The FHNSI-10, FHNSI-7, and the pain, fatigue, and breathing symptom scores at baseline showed evidence of predictive criterion validity for overall survival, but not time-to-progression (TTP). Changes in the symptom indexes and individual symptom scores were not associated with changes in performance status over 4 weeks, though most patients had stable performance status.

Conclusions: There is initial evidence of validity for the FHNSI-10 and FHNSI-7 indexes and selected individual symptom endpoints as brief disease-related symptom assessments for patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724483PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3506DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fhnsi-10 fhnsi-7
20
individual symptom
16
symptom indexes
12
patients recurrent
12
recurrent metastatic
12
head neck
12
pain fatigue
12
symptom scores
12
symptom
11
metastatic squamous
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • * A study involving 239 patients validated the FHNSI-10 and FHNSI-7, showing good internal consistency and reliability, and demonstrated their potential use in evaluating patient-reported symptoms.
  • * The findings suggest that while these symptom indexes correlate with patients' performance status and survival outcomes, changes in symptom scores do not necessarily reflect changes in performance status over a short period.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!