AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to create and assess a new self-care measure for patients in inpatient rehabilitation, focusing on both clinician observations and patient performance.
  • The method involved analyzing self-care assessments from over 7,700 patients using advanced statistical techniques to refine the measurement tool and ensure its reliability.
  • The results showed that the new self-care measure was more sensitive to patient improvements than existing methods, detecting earlier progress in a significant number of patients who otherwise wouldn’t have been recognized by traditional assessments.

Article Abstract

Objective: To develop and evaluate a measure of clinician-observed and patient-performed self-care function for use during inpatient rehabilitation.

Design: Retrospective analysis of self-care assessments collected by therapists using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) followed by multidimensional item response theory (MIRT).

Setting: Freestanding inpatient rehabilitation hospital in the Midwestern United States.

Participants: Inpatients (N=7719) with stroke, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, neurologic disorders, and musculoskeletal conditions.

Interventions: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A total of 19 clinician-selected self-care measures including the FIM and patient-performed, clinician-rated measures of balance, upper extremity function, strength, changing body position, and swallowing. Clinicians completed assessments on admission and at least 1 interim assessment.

Results: CFA was completed for 3 patient groups defined by their highest level of balance (sitting, standing, walking). We reduced the number of items by 47.5% while maintaining acceptable internal consistency; unidimensionality within each item set required development of testlets. A recursive analysis defined a self-care measure with sensitivity (Cohen d =1.13; Cohen d.=0.91) greater than the FIM self-care items (d.=0.94; d .=0.83). The CFA models provided good to acceptable fit (root mean square error of approximations 0.03-0.06). Most patients with admission FIM self-care ratings of total assistance (88%, 297 of 338) made improvements on the MIRT self-care measure that were undetected by the FIM; the FIM detected no change for 26% of these patients (78 of 297). The remaining 74% (219 of 297) improved on the MIRT-based measure an average of 14 days earlier than was detected by the FIM.

Conclusions: This MIRT self-care measure possesses measurement properties that are superior to the FIM, particularly for patients near its floor or ceiling. Methods assure accommodation for multidimensionality and high levels of sensitivity. This self-care measure has the potential to improve monitoring of self-care and manage therapy effectively during inpatient rehabilitation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.08.021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

self-care measure
16
inpatient rehabilitation
12
self-care
11
fim self-care
8
mirt self-care
8
measure
7
fim
6
development multidimensional
4
multidimensional multigroup
4
multigroup measure
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!