A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A narrative review of peer support barriers and facilitators in kidney care. | LitMetric

A narrative review of peer support barriers and facilitators in kidney care.

J Ren Care

School of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Published: March 2021

Introduction: Patients with chronic kidney disease often experience emotional/mental challenges and benefit from peer support, as it provides insight/information from others with the same condition. Previous studies show it is effective in improving health outcomes and aids in treatment decisions.

Literature Review: There is low peer support uptake among patients with chronic kidney disease in the United Kingdom and staff do not utilise peer support services fully. Few studies within the United Kingdom have focused on peer support barriers/facilitators, so this narrative review aimed to understand them from staff and patient perspectives.

Materials And Methods: A comprehensive search strategy and inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied with a two-step process of article selection employed using two reviewers. Thematic analysis was applied.

Results: Five articles were included and six themes emerged. Low referrals and difficulty matching were staff barriers; concern regarding the relationship dynamic and the format/delivery were patient barriers. Promotion of the service aided the uptake from staff, while patients valued inclusivity.

Discussion: Increased promotion of peer support benefits through training/awareness may improve staff referrals and there should be greater exposure nationally. A flexible format is essential to ensure ample opportunity for access.

Conclusion: This review highlights the current literature on peer support barriers/facilitators. Further study is needed to evidence which approaches best overcome staff- and patient-barriers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984070PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12350DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peer support
28
narrative review
8
patients chronic
8
chronic kidney
8
kidney disease
8
united kingdom
8
support barriers/facilitators
8
peer
7
support
7
staff
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!