Experts are typically advised to avoid jargon when communicating with the general public, but previous research has not established whether avoiding jargon is necessary in a crisis. Using the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic as a backdrop, this online survey experiment (N = 393) examined the effect of jargon use across three different topics that varied in situational urgency: COVID-19 (high urgency), flood risk (low urgency), and federal emergency policy (control). Results revealed that although the use of jargon led to more difficult processing and reduced persuasion for the two less-urgent topics (flood risk, emergency policy), there was no effect of jargon in the COVID-19 condition. Theoretically, these findings suggest that the motivation to process information is an important moderator for crisis communication in particular and science communication in general. Practically, these findings suggest that science communicators, during times of crisis, do not need to "dumb down" their language in the same way they should during non-crises.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540871 | PMC |
| http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239524 | PLOS |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Development and evaluation of a decision aid for HPV vaccination among adults aged 27-45 years old in the United States.
Comput Biol Med
December 2024
Department of Population and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, Fort Worth, TX, 76107, USA; Department of Quantitative and Qualitative Health Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health San Antonio, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 8403 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Objective: To design, develop, and field test the HPV Decide decision tool to facilitate shared clinical decision-making recommendation for mid-adult HPV vaccination.
Methods: The 'HPV Decide' online tool was developed through a 6-step process, involving community and provider advisory boards, usability testing with 10 end users (unvaccinated adults aged 27-45), field testing interviews with another 10, and interviews with 18 healthcare providers. The process incorporated both inductive and deductive qualitative data analyses.
'Picking up the pieces': primary care practitioners' experiences of cancer care reviews.
BJGP Open
August 2024
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Background: The number of people who are living with and beyond cancer is increasing in England. Primary care delivers cancer care via structured proactive conversations which are incentivised through the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QoF): 'cancer care reviews' (CCRs). Declining workforce numbers, increasing patient demand, CCR policy changes in 2020 and the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, highlight a need to explore how staff deliver CCRs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIn response to significant societal challenges, there is a growing demand for scientists to actively engage in public discussions. The recent Covid-19 pandemic led to the sudden visibility of certain scientists, necessitating them to extend their roles beyond research and actively communicate with the general public. Online platforms allow for direct engagement but increase the challenge by interconnecting different public arenas.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCognitive factors impacting patient understanding of laboratory test information.
J Pathol Inform
December 2024
Mercer University School of Medicine, Mercer University Health Sciences Center, 1250 East 66 Street, Savannah, Georgia, USA.
Laboratory testing can provide information useful to promote patient health literacy and ultimately patient well-being. The human state of mind involves not only cognition but also emotion and motivation factors when receiving, processing, and acting upon information. The cognitive load for patients acquiring and processing new information is high.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA qualitative study examining young peoples' perceptions and adherence to COVID-19 public health guidelines in Ireland.
BMC Public Health
September 2023
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Plassey Park Road, Limerick, Ireland.
Background: Public health measures are the main intervention to stop the spread of COVID-19. They rely on the adherence to everyday health behaviors, and depend on those at high and low personal risk of serious disease to comply. Young people are crucial to stemming community transmission, and are often living in shared housing and at a stage of their lives with more economic uncertainty than older groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!