AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention using either radial or femoral artery access.
  • Data from the SWEDEHEART registry indicated that radial access was linked to a significantly lower risk of 30-day mortality, in-hospital bleeding, and cardiogenic shock compared to femoral access.
  • These results support the preference for radial access in these procedures and align with findings from recent randomized trials, reinforcing the benefits of this approach.

Article Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this observational study was to evaluate the effects of radial artery access versus femoral artery access on the risk of 30-day mortality, inhospital bleeding and cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Methods: We used data from the SWEDEHEART registry and included all patients who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Sweden between 2005 and 2016. We compared patients who had percutaneous coronary intervention by radial access versus femoral access with regard to the primary endpoint of all-cause death within 30 days, using a multilevel propensity score adjusted logistic regression which included hospital as a random effect.

Results: During the study period, 44,804 patients underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention of whom 24,299 (54.2%) had radial and 20,505 (45.8%) femoral access. There were 2487 (5.5%) deaths within 30 days, of which 920 (3.8%) occurred in the radial access and 1567 (7.6%) in the femoral access group. After propensity score adjustment, radial access was associated with a lower risk of death (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.88,  = 0.025). We found no interaction between access site and age, gender and cardiogenic shock regarding 30-day mortality. Radial access was also associated with a lower adjusted risk of bleeding (adjusted OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.79,  = 0.006) and cardiogenic shock (adjusted OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.73,  = 0.002).

Conclusions: In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, primary percutaneous coronary intervention by radial access rather than femoral access was associated with an adjusted lower risk of death, bleeding and cardiogenic shock. Our findings are consistent with, and add external validity to, recent randomised trials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7756052PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2048872620908032DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

percutaneous coronary
20
radial access
20
access associated
16
cardiogenic shock
16
primary percutaneous
16
coronary intervention
16
femoral access
16
access
13
artery access
12
associated lower
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!