A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Optimal Ga-PSMA and F-PSMA PET window levelling for gross tumour volume delineation in primary prostate cancer. | LitMetric

Purpose: This study proposes optimal tracer-specific threshold-based window levels for PSMA PET-based intraprostatic gross tumour volume (GTV) contouring to reduce interobserver delineation variability.

Methods: Nine Ga-PSMA-11 and nine F-PSMA-1007 PET scans including GTV delineations of four expert teams (GTV) and a majority-voted GTV (GTV) were assessed with respect to a registered histopathological GTV (GTV) as the gold standard reference. The standard uptake values (SUVs) per voxel were converted to a percentage (SUV%) relative to the SUV. The statistically optimised SUV% threshold (SOST) was defined as those that maximises accuracy for threshold-based contouring. A leave-one-out cross-validation receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the SOST for each tracer. The SOST analysis was performed twice, first using the GTV contour as training structure (GTV) and second using the GTV contour as training structure (GTV) to correct for any limited misregistration. The accuracy of both GTV and GTV was calculated relative to GTV in the 'leave-one-out' patient of each fold and compared with the accuracy of GTV.

Results: ROC curve analysis for Ga-PSMA-11 PET revealed a median threshold of 25 SUV% (range, 22-27 SUV%) and 41 SUV% (40-43 SUV%) for GTV and GTV, respectively. For F-PSMA-1007 PET, a median threshold of 42 SUV% (39-45 SUV%) for GTV and 44 SUV% (42-45 SUV%) for GTV was found. A significant pairwise difference was observed when comparing the accuracy of the GTV contours with the median accuracy of the GTV contours (median, - 2.5%; IQR, - 26.5-0.2%; p = 0.020), whereas no significant pairwise difference was found for the GTV contours (median, - 0.3%; IQR, - 4.4-0.6%; p = 0.199).

Conclusions: Threshold-based contouring using GTV-trained SOSTs achieves an accuracy comparable with manual contours in delineating GTV. The median SOSTs of 41 SUV% for Ga-PSMA-11 PET and 44 SUV% for F-PSMA-1007 PET form a base for tracer-specific window levelling.

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov ; NCT03327675; 31-10-2017.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05059-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gtv
22
gtv gtv
16
f-psma-1007 pet
12
suv%
12
accuracy gtv
12
suv% gtv
12
gtv contours
12
contours median
12
gross tumour
8
tumour volume
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!