AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to validate the CT-Valve score to identify patients with valvular heart disease who are at low risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) and could opt for multislice CT (MSCT) instead of coronary angiography (CAG).
  • Conducted as a prospective cohort study over two years, it involved patients referred for valve surgery, excluding those with existing CAD or chronic kidney disease, and assessed the need for follow-up CAG after MSCT based on the CT-Valve score.
  • Results indicated that the CT-Valve score is effective; using a score of 7 or below showed a reduction in both costs (40%) and radiation exposure (41%), while follow-up revealed no ischemic events for patients

Article Abstract

Objective: To prospectively validate the CT-Valve score, a new risk score designed to identify patients with valvular heart disease at a low risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) who could benefit from multislice CT (MSCT) first instead of coronary angiography (CAG).

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of patients referred for valve surgery in the Capital Region of Denmark and Odense University Hospital from the 1 February 2015 to the 1 February 2017. MSCT was implemented for patients with a CT-Valve score ≤7 at the referring physician's discretion. Patients with a history of CAD or chronic kidney disease were excluded. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients needing reevaluation with CAG after MSCT and risk of CAD among the patients determined to be low to intermediate risk.

Results: In total, 1149 patients were included. The median score was 9 (IQR 3) and 339 (30%) had a score ≤7. MSCT was used for 117 patients. Of these 29 (25%) were reevaluated and 9 (7.7%) had CAD. Of the 222 patients with a score ≤7 that did not receive an MSCT, 14 (6%) had significant CAD. The estimated total cost of evaluation among patients with a score ≤7 before implementation was €132 093 compared with €79 073 after, a 40% reduction. Similarly, estimated total radiation before and after was 608 mSv and 362 mSv, a 41% reduction. Follow-up at a median of 32 months (18-48) showed no ischaemic events for patients receiving only MSCT.

Conclusion: The CT-Valve score is a valid method for determining risk of CAD among patients with valvular heart disease. Using a score ≤7 as a cut-off for the use of MSCT is safe and cost-effective.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537465PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2020-001380DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ct-valve score
16
score ≤7
16
patients
13
patients valvular
12
valvular heart
12
heart disease
12
score
10
risk cad
8
cad patients
8
patients score
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!