Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for the treatment of oligometastatic lung disease.

Diagn Interv Imaging

Interventional Radiology, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 94805 Villejuif, France; University of Paris-Saclay, 91190 Saint-Aubin, France; Institut d'Oncologie thoracique, 94805 Villejuif, France.

Published: January 2021

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare efficacy and tolerance between radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgery for the treatment of oligometastatic lung disease.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective study reviewed patients treated in two institutions for up to 5 pulmonary metastases with a maximal diameter of 4cm and without associated pleural involvement or thoracic lymphadenopathy. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment outcome, and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Efficacy endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and pulmonary or local tumor progression rates.

Results: Among 204 patients identified, 78 patients (42 men, 36 women; mean age, 53.3±14.9 [SD]; age range: 15-81 years) were treated surgically, while 126 patients (59 men, 67 women; mean age, 62.2±10.8 [SD]; age range: 33-80 years) were treated by RFA. In the RFA cohort, patients were significantly older (P<0.0001), with more extra-thoracic localisation (P=0.015) and bilateral tumour burden (P=0.0014). In comparison between surgery and RFA cohorts, respectively, the 1- and 3-year OS were 94.8 and 67.2% vs. 94 and 72.1% (P=0.46), the 1- and 3-year PFS were 49.4% and 26.1% vs. 38.9% and 14.8% (P=0.12), the pulmonary progression rates were 39.1% and 56% vs. 41.2% and 65.3% (P>0.99), and the local tumour progression rates were 5.4% and 10.6% vs. 4.8% and 18.6% (P=0.07). Tumour size>2cm was associated with a significantly higher local tumor progression in the RFA group (P=0.010). Hospitalisation stay was significantly shorter in the RFA group (median of 3 days; IQR=2 days; range: 2-12 days) than in the surgery group (median of 9 days; IQR=2 days; range: 6-21 days) (P<0.01).

Conclusion: RFA should be considered a minimally-invasive alternative with similar OS and PFS to surgery in the treatment of solitary or multiple lung metastases measuring less than 4cm in diameter without associated pleural involvement or thoracic lymphadenopathy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2020.09.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radiofrequency ablation
8
treatment oligometastatic
8
oligometastatic lung
8
local tumor
8
tumor progression
8
patients men
8
men women
8
women age
8
[sd] age
8
age range
8

Similar Publications

To assess the efficacy and safety of "one-stop" procedures combining radiofrequency catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure by guidance of intracardiac echocardiography(ICE) in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent ICE-guided "one-stop" procedures at the Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command between December 2020 and January 2023. Patients were divided into elderly group (age≥60 years old) and non-elderly group (age 18-59 years old).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Junctional rhythm (JR) frequently occurs during radiofrequency (RF) ablation procedures targeting the slow pathway (SP) for atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), signaling successful ablation. Two types of JR have been noticed: typical JR as His activation preceding atrial activation, and atypical JR as atrial activation preceding the His activation. Nevertheless, the origin and characteristics of JR remain incompletely defined.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background & Aims: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the standard treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), specifically for tumors <3 cm in size and numbering fewer than three, excluding surgical candidates. Microwave ablation (MWA) is an innovative approach believed to have theoretical benefits over RFA; however, these advantages are yet to be empirically verified. Therefore, we evaluated and compared the effectiveness of MWA and RFA in managing HCC tumors up to 4 cm in size.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!