A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Hemodynamic Responses to Resuscitation during Uncontrolled Hemorrhage. | LitMetric

We investigated whether a statistical model could predict mean arterial pressure (MAP) during uncontrolled hemorrhage; such a model could be used for automated decision support, to help clinicians decide when to provide intravascular volume to achieve MAP goals. This was a secondary analysis of adult swine subjects during uncontrolled splenic bleeding. By protocol, after developing severe hypotension (MAP < 60 mmHg), subjects were resuscitated with either saline (NS) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP), determined randomly. Vital signs were documented at quasi-regular time-step intervals, until either subject death or 300 min. Subjects were randomly separated 50%/50% into training/validation sets, and regression models were developed to predict MAP for each subsequent (i.e., future) time-step. Median time-steps for serially recorded vital signs were +15 min. 5 subjects survived the protocol; 17 died after a median time of 87 min (IQR 78 - 134). The final model consisted of: current MAP; heart rate (HR); prior NS; imminent NS; and imminent FFP. The 95% limits-of-agreement between true subsequent MAP vs. predicted subsequent MAP were +10/-11 mmHg for the 79 time-steps in the training set; and +14/-13 for the 64 time-steps in the validation set. A total of 10 sudden death events (i.e., rapid, fatal MAP decrease within one single time-step) were excluded from analysis. In conclusion, for uncontrolled hemorrhage in a swine model, it was possible to estimate the next documented MAP value on the basis of the subject's current documented MAP; HR; prior NS; and the volume of resuscitation about to be administered. However, the model was unable to predict "sudden death" events. The applicability to populations with wider heterogeneity of hemorrhage patterns and with comorbidities requires further investigation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176141DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

uncontrolled hemorrhage
12
map
10
vital signs
8
min subjects
8
subsequent map
8
documented map
8
model
6
development validation
4
validation predictive
4
predictive model
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!