Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Myoelectric prostheses are commonly controlled by surface EMG. Many control algorithms, including the user learning-based control paradigm abstract control, benefit from independent control signals. Measuring at the surface of the skin reduces the signal independence through cross talk. To increase the number of independent signals, intramuscular EMG recordings might be a viable alternative for myoelectric control. This proof of concept study investigated if real time abstract myoelectric control is possible with intramuscular measurements. Six participants performed a 4-target and 12-target abstract control task with both surface and intramuscular EMG recordings. The results suggest that intramuscular EMG is suitable for abstract control, and that performance could be increased in the future by stabilizing the amplitude of the processed intramuscular EMG signal.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9175402 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!