Assessing the scalability of innovations in primary care: a cross-sectional study.

CMAJ Open

VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable (Ben Charif, Zomahoun, Massougbodji, Khadhraoui, Gogovor, Légaré), Québec, Que.; Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation (Ben Charif, Gogovor, Légaré), Université Laval; Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit (Zomahoun, Massougbodji, Khadhraoui, Gogovor), Université Laval; Collège québécois des médecins de famille (Dumas Pilon, Boulanger, Campbell), Laval, Que.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Poitras), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Ben Charif, Légaré), Université Laval, Québec, Que.; Department of Family Medicine (Dumas Pilon) and School of Physical & Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Zomahoun), McGill University, Montréal, Que.

Published: May 2021

Background: Canadian health funding currently prioritizes scaling up for evidence-based primary care innovations, but not all teams prepare for scaling up. We explored scalability assessment among primary care innovators in the province of Quebec to evaluate their preparedness for scaling up.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional survey from Feb. 18 to Mar. 18, 2019. Eligible participants were 33 innovation teams selected for the 2019 Quebec College of Family Physicians' Symposium on Innovations. We conducted a Web-based survey in 2 sections: innovation characteristics and the Innovation Scalability Self-administered Questionnaire. The latter includes 16 criteria (scalability components) grouped into 5 dimensions: theory (1 criterion), impact (6 criteria), coverage (4 criteria), setting (3 criteria) and cost (2 criteria). We classified innovation types using the . We performed a descriptive analysis using frequency counts and percentages.

Results: Out of 33 teams, 24 participated (72.7%), with 1 innovation each. The types of innovation were management (15/24), prevention (8/24) and therapeutic (1/24). Most management innovations focused on patient navigation (9/15). In order of frequency, teams had assessed theory (79.2%) and impact (79.2%) criteria, followed by cost (77.1%), setting (59.7%) and coverage (54.2%). Most innovations (16/24) had assessed 10 criteria or more, including 10 management innovations, 5 prevention innovations and 1 therapeutic innovation. Implementation fidelity was the least assessed criterion (6/24).

Interpretation: The scalability assessments of a primary care innovation varied according to its type. Management innovations, which were the most prevalent and assessed the most scalability components, appear to be most prepared for primary care scale-up in Canada.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7567510PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200030DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

primary care
20
management innovations
12
innovations
8
innovation
8
scalability components
8
criteria cost
8
innovation types
8
criteria
7
primary
5
care
5

Similar Publications

Background: Tissue-based genomic classifiers (GCs) have been developed to improve prostate cancer (PCa) risk assessment and treatment recommendations.

Purpose: To summarize the impact of the Decipher, Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score (GPS), and Prolaris GCs on risk stratification and patient-clinician decisions on treatment choice among patients with localized PCa considering first-line treatment.

Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science published from January 2010 to August 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Description: In July 2024, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) to monitor and improve the health of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder show promise; however, user engagement is variable, and integrated clinical use is low.

Objective: This prospectively registered systematic review examined barriers and facilitators of clinician and patient engagement with DMHIs, to inform implementation within real-world settings.

Methods: A systematic search of 7 databases identified empirical studies reporting qualitative or quantitative data about factors affecting staff or patient engagement with DMHIs aiming to monitor or improve the mental or physical health of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cardiovascular disease is the main cause of mortality in Mexico as well as the rest of the world, with dyslipidemia being one of the main risk factors. Despite the importance of its epidemiological impact, there is still -among primary care physicians- a lack of knowledge ranging from the basic concepts for diagnosis to the most recent recommendations for treatment. This document consisting of 10 questions is done by experts in this field.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We compared substance use disorder (SUD) prevalence among adult inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) hospitalizations with non-IBD controls from the 2016-2018 National Inpatient Sample, assessing correlations with demographics, socioeconomic status, geographic regions, depression, and anxiety. The primary aim focused on SUD, defined as substance abuse or dependence (: F10-F19) excluding unspecified use or remission, among hospitalizations documenting IBD (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis; : K50-51) as one admitting diagnosis (IBD-D). The prevalence of SUD among hospitalizations with and without IBD was compared.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!