AI Article Synopsis

  • The study highlights a distress screening program implemented in a Veterans Affairs oncology clinic serving a majority African American male population with low socioeconomic status, addressing the need for better support in cancer care.
  • The program, funded by the Coleman Foundation, followed a phased approach that included organizing stakeholders, educating staff, and delivering distress screenings using validated tools, but ultimately did not reach all veterans.
  • Results showed that while the program engaged many patients in psychosocial services, the success varied and emphasized the need for tailored screening initiatives that consider the unique challenges faced by underserved communities, such as access to housing and food support.

Article Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend systematic evaluation of distress screening and referral for cancer patients. Implementation remains a notable gap for cancer centers serving disadvantaged communities. We present the implementation of a distress screening program within a Veterans Affairs hospital oncology clinic, serving a majority African American (AA) male population of low socioeconomic status (SES).

Methods: The Coleman Foundation funded this program supporting a palliative care physician and psychologist to implement screening in a phased approach as follows: (1) Organizing key stakeholders, (2) educating clinical staff, (3) delivering distress screening, (4) generating documentation, and (5) implementing clinical action and referral pathways. We utilized validated measures in the "Patient Screening Questions for Supportive Care" screening tool.

Results: This program was unsuccessful in screening all veterans with cancer; however, we were able to implement 3 years of longitudinal screening. In distress screens from the initial program period (n = 253), patients were primarily males (95.6%) of older age (m = 70, standard deviation = 9.45), AA (76.4%), with various cancers of advanced disease (69%). Males reported moderate psychosocial distress and elevated financial needs. For males with elevated psychosocial distress (n = 63, PHQ-4 ≥3), 36% were previously connected with psychosocial services. Following screening, engagement increased as the majority (77%) established psychosocial care.

Conclusions: This screening program had mixed success. Centralized program staff and available supportive care referrals were critical for program implementation. Screening may have increased engagement in social work/mental health services for males of low SES. Screening programs should be tailored to the needs of underserved communities with accessible housing/food subsidies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.5565DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

distress screening
16
screening
13
veterans cancer
8
screening program
8
psychosocial distress
8
distress
7
program
7
meeting guidelines
4
guidelines implementing
4
implementing distress
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!