Should Dairy Cattle Be Trained to a Virtual Fence System as Individuals or in Groups?

Animals (Basel)

School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden 2570, NSW, Australia.

Published: September 2020

Pre-commercial virtual fence (VF) neckbands (eShepherd, Agersens, Melbourne, Vic, Australia) can contain cows within a designated area without the need for physical fencing, through associative learning of a paired audio tone and electrical pulse. Cattle are gregarious, so there may be an impact of herd mates on the learning process. To evaluate this, a VF was set 30 m down one of three test paddocks with a feed attractant 70 m past the VF. Twenty-three Holstein-Friesian cows were all fitted with VF neckbands and trained as individuals or in groups (5-6) for four 10 min tests; then, cows were crossed over to the alternate context for two more 10 min tests. The number of cows breaking through the VF and the number of paired stimuli reduced across time (from 82% to 26% and 45% to 14%, respectively, < 0.01). Cows trained in a group (88%) were more likely to interact with the VF in the crossover compared to those trained as individuals (36%) ( < 0.01), indicating an influence of group members on individual cow response. Individual training is impractical, therefore, future research should evaluate group training protocols ensuring all cows learn the VF to avoid any adverse impacts on animal welfare.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600956PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10101767DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

virtual fence
8
trained individuals
8
min tests
8
cows
6
dairy cattle
4
trained
4
cattle trained
4
trained virtual
4
fence system
4
system individuals
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!