AI Article Synopsis

  • The text highlights the growing need for competency-based training in global health, with a focus on developing structured curricula for public health professionals, but notes a lack of literature on effective implementation.
  • The scoping review aims to analyze existing practices, gaps, and consensus on competencies in global health education, specifically looking at target audiences, skill levels, and teaching/assessment techniques.
  • Among the 68 reviewed documents, 21 provided relevant data, primarily targeting post-graduate students and professionals, and identified various pedagogical and assessment methods aimed at enhancing competency in global health contexts.

Article Abstract

Background: As the field of global health expands, the recognition of structured training for field-based public health professionals has grown. Substantial effort has gone towards defining competency domains for public health professionals working globally. However, there is limited literature on how to implement competency-based training into learning curricula and evaluation strategies.

Objectives: This scoping review seeks to collate the current status, degree of consensus, and best practices, as well as gaps and areas of divergence, related to the implementation of competencies in global health curricula. Specifically, we sought to examine (i) the target audience, (ii) the levels or milestones, and (iii) the pedagogy and assessment approaches.

Sources Of Evidence: A review of the published and grey literature was completed to identify published and grey literature sources that presented information on how to implement or support global health and public health competency-based education programs. In particular, we sought to capture any attempts to assign levels or milestones, any evaluation strategies, and the different pedagogical approaches.

Results: Out of 68 documents reviewed, 21 documents were included which contained data related to the implementation of competency-based training programs; of these, 18 were peer-reviewed and three were from the grey literature. Most of the sources focused on post-graduate public health students, professional trainees pursuing continuing education training, and clinical and allied health professionals working in global health. Two approaches were identified to defining skill level or milestones, namely: (i) defining levels of increasing ability or (ii) changing roles across career stages. Pedagogical approaches featured field experience, direct engagement, group work, and self-reflection. Assessment approaches included self-assessment surveys, evaluations by peers and supervisors, and mixed methods assessments.

Conclusions: The implementation of global health competencies needs to respond to the needs of specific agencies or particular groups of learners. A milestones approach may aide these efforts while also support monitoring and evaluation. Further development is needed to understand how to assess competencies in a consistent and relevant manner.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7529249PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239917PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

global health
24
public health
16
health professionals
12
grey literature
12
health
11
implementation global
8
health competencies
8
scoping review
8
pedagogy assessment
8
professionals working
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!