Background: Patient selection for cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) in the United States remains a topic of debate among surgeons. Many surgeons base US patient selection for CDA implantation on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indications/contraindications. While off-label use does occur, the frequency and extent of off-label use in the US remains largely unknown. Outside the United States, patient selection is notably less stringent; however such data also remain largely unpublished or presented/published with a low level of evidence. Here, we will review the current approved US on-label patient selection criteria for CDA and discuss the rationale and supporting evidence to expand these criteria in the United States.

Methods: A PubMed literature search was completed using the keywords "cervical disc arthroplasty" and "cervical disc replacement." The articles were evaluated by the authors for patient selection criteria.

Conclusions: The current published data do not conclusively prove that the patients excluded from CDA by strict adherence to FDA indications would benefit from CDA surgery over anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. As surgeons, it is a difficult decision regarding when to expand indications to include off-label use of CDA. In our practice, generally CDA patient selection agrees with the FDA indications and contraindications, as there is a lack of level 1 evidence to confirm effectiveness of CDA outside of the current FDA indications. We will likely need more well-constructed studies to include prospective and controlled trials that specifically evaluate the "off-label" applications before US surgeons are convinced to expand indications and insurance companies agree to reimburse.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7528765PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/7088DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patient selection
28
fda indications
12
selection cervical
8
cervical disc
8
disc arthroplasty
8
cda
8
united states
8
level evidence
8
"cervical disc
8
expand indications
8

Similar Publications

There is a pressing need to improve risk stratification and treatment selection for HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) due to the adverse side effects of treatment. One of the most important prognostic features is lymph nodes involvement. Previously, we demonstrated that tumor formation in patient-derived xenografts (i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

colorectal cancer is a common and serious condition, with surgical resection being the primary treatment for localized cases. Anastomotic dehiscence (AD) remains a significant postoperative complication, and anastomoses are typically created using either manual suturing or mechanical stapling, each with specific benefits and challenge. Material and this retrospective study analyzed outcomes in 100 rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection, with anastomoses performed via manual suturing (n=50) or mechanical stapling (n=50).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: This study compared echocardiography (echo) and cardiac computed tomography (CT) in measuring the Wilkins score and evaluated the potential added benefit of CT in predicting immediate percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (PMV) outcomes in rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS) patients deemed eligible for PMV by echo.

Methods And Results: From a multicentre registry of 3,140 patients with at least moderate MS, we included 96 patients (age 56.4±11.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dual-stage optimizer for systematic overestimation adjustment applied to multi-objective genetic algorithms for biomarker selection.

Brief Bioinform

November 2024

School of Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, PO Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.

The selection of biomarker panels in omics data, challenged by numerous molecular features and limited samples, often requires the use of machine learning methods paired with wrapper feature selection techniques, like genetic algorithms. They test various feature sets-potential biomarker solutions-to fine-tune a machine learning model's performance for supervised tasks, such as classifying cancer subtypes. This optimization process is undertaken using validation sets to evaluate and identify the most effective feature combinations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!