Background: The mainstay of treatment for pancreatic cancer is surgical resection; however, positive surgical margins remain commonplace. We identified hospitals with higher than predicted rates of positive margins and isolated factors that caused this discordance.

Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients with head of the pancreas adenocarcinoma in the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2015. A nomogram was used to calculate the observed to expected positive margin rates (O/E) for facilities. If the O/E differed significantly ( < .05), it was considered an outlier.

Results: Among a total of 19 968 patients, 24.3% had positive margins. Among hospitals with lower than expected positive margin rates, 73.6% were academic or research programs, 17% were comprehensive community cancer programs, and none were community cancer programs ( = .0002). Within the group with higher than expected positive margin rates, 47% were comprehensive community cancer programs and 38.6% were academic or research programs ( = .0002). The mean hospital volume was higher in the low positive margin group (110.4 vs 48.8, < .0001).

Conclusions: Facility type and hospital volume can predict improvement in the O/E ratio for margin positivity in pancreatic adenocarcinoma resection. Surgeons should consider referral to academic or research facilities with higher case volumes for improved surgical resection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003134820950281DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

positive margin
16
surgical resection
12
expected positive
12
margin rates
12
community cancer
12
cancer programs
12
higher expected
8
national cancer
8
cancer database
8
positive margins
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!