A clinical profile of revision cochlear implant surgery: MERF experience.

Cochlear Implants Int

Department of ENT, Madras ENT Research Foundation, Chennai 600028, India.

Published: March 2021

To study the prevalence of revision cochlear implant study in a tertiary care referral center. To assess the various indications and surgical outcomes of revision cochlear implant surgery. A retrospective chart review of revision cochlear implant surgery done from June 1997 to December 2019. All the surgeries that were done in children of 12 years and below were included. The revision surgeries were either with or without explantation and reimplantation. The causes included were device failures, electrode extrusion/malposition, magnet migration, persistent foreign body reaction, facial twitching, wound infection, and cholesteatoma. A total of 1636 pediatric cochlear implantation surgery were performed during the study period of 22 years. There were 94 (5.7%) revision surgeries done for various indications during this period. Out of them, 67 patients (71.3%) had device failure thus being the commonest indication for revision surgery, followed by infection in 12.8% of the total patients. Among the total revision, 81 (86.2%) patients had explantation and reimplantation of the new device. Indications of revision cochlear implant surgery are manifold that can be either device-related or patient-related. Revision surgery needs a highly skilled and experienced team of surgeons, audiologists, and habilitationists for achieving optimal results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2020.1823128DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

revision cochlear
20
cochlear implant
20
implant surgery
16
revision
10
revision surgeries
8
explantation reimplantation
8
revision surgery
8
surgery
7
cochlear
6
implant
5

Similar Publications

Lessons learned in delayed identification of a misplaced electrode array in the vestibule.

J Otol

October 2024

Department of Ear, Nose and Throat - Head and Neck Surgery, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, 1 Jurong East Street 21, Singapore, 609606, Singapore.

To report a case of cochlear implantation with a misplaced electrode array in the vestibule and the causes for the delay in identification. A 23-year-old male with left single-sided deafness underwent cochlear implantation. The intraoperative assessment did not reveal any major red flags of electrode array misplacement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Development and Prevention of Biofilm on Cochlear Implants: A Systematic Review.

Medicina (Kaunas)

November 2024

1st Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.

Biofilm formation on cochlear implants (CIs) poses a major problem for surgeons, leading to a high incidence of explantation and revision surgery. Therefore, developing appropriate and cost-effective biofilm detection and prevention techniques is of the essence. In this systematic review, we sought to investigate the development of biofilm formation on CIs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rare case of cochlear implant damaged by nearby use of monopolar electrosurgery.

Am J Otolaryngol

December 2024

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America. Electronic address:

Objectives: To present a rare case of a cochlear implant (CI) damaged by nearby use of monopolar electrosurgery.

Patient: A 38-year-old man with a right-sided CI reported that his implant had stopped producing sound immediately after his meningioma resection.

Interventions: Right pterional craniotomy with use of monopolar electrosurgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the clinical findings of our cochlear implant (CI) patients with otitis media with effusion (OME) and CI patients treated with ventilation tube (VT) for OME.

Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent CI surgery at Hacettepe University, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, between November 1997 and March 2023 were reviewed. Patients who had OME or VT in the implanted ear at the time of surgery were included in the study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!