A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Hormonal contraception and risk of STIs and bacterial vaginosis in South African adolescents: secondary analysis of a randomised trial. | LitMetric

Objectives: Young women in sub-Saharan Africa are at high risk of STIs and unintended pregnancies, yet hormonal contraceptive (HC) use may affect STI risk. We compared the influence of three HCs on the incidence and prevalence of STIs and bacterial vaginosis (BV) in South African adolescents.

Methods: One hundred and thirty adolescents between 15 and 19 years were randomised to the injectable norethisterone enanthate (Net-En), combined oral contraceptives (COC) (Triphasil or Nordette) or a combined contraceptive vaginal ring (CCVR; NuvaRing) for 16 weeks (clinicaltrials.gov/NCT02404038). Vaginal samples were collected at baseline and 16 weeks post contraceptive initiation for STI and BV testing.

Results: In an intention-to-treat analysis, no significant differences in BV prevalence were found between study arms. The overall incidence of any STI at follow-up was high: 16.2% in the COC arm; 25.7% in the Net-En arm; and 37.1% in the CCVR arm. The incidence rate (IR) of any STI was similar between Net-En (IR 0.74 (95% CI 0.34 to 1.41)) and the oestrogen-containing contraceptives (IR 0.78 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.22)). A lower IR of (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.68 (95% CI 0.19 to 1.99)) and (IRR 0.25 (95% CI 0.01 to 1.35)) but a higher IR of (IRR 16.0 (95% CI 2.96 to 400)), was observed in the Net-En arm compared with the oestrogen-containing contraceptives, although the overall incidence of was low (4.7%). In an exploratory analysis, the risk of any STI and was lower in the COC arm compared with CCVR. A per-protocol analysis yielded similar results.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that use of Net-En may be associated with increased risk of compared with oestrogen-containing contraceptives but not with overall STI risk. COC use may decrease STI risk relative to CCVR.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2020-054483DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sti risk
12
oestrogen-containing contraceptives
12
risk stis
8
stis bacterial
8
bacterial vaginosis
8
vaginosis south
8
south african
8
risk compared
8
coc arm
8
net-en arm
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!