A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Low-Intensity Intervention Supports Diabetes Registry Implementation: A Cluster-Randomized Trial in the Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network (ACORN). | LitMetric

Low-Intensity Intervention Supports Diabetes Registry Implementation: A Cluster-Randomized Trial in the Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network (ACORN).

J Am Board Fam Med

From the Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (RTS); Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (RTS, RSE, MMG, NJJ, JPO, SRR); TMF Health Quality Institute, Austin, TX (JCC).

Published: July 2021

Background: Previous research demonstrated that registries are effective for improving clinical guideline adherence for the care of patients with type 2 diabetes. However, registry implementation has typically relied on intensive support (such as practice facilitators) for practice change and care improvement.

Objective: To determine whether a remotely delivered, low-intensity organizational change intervention supports implementation and use of diabetes registries in primary care.

Design: Cluster-randomized controlled effectiveness trial of providing limited external support leveraging internal practice resources and problem-solving capacities for driving diabetes registry implementation in 32 practices in Virginia.

Intervention: All practices identified local implementation champions who participated in an in-person education session on the value and use of diabetes registries, while intervention practices were also paired with peer mentors and had access to a physician informaticist, who worked remotely to assist practices with implementation.

Main Measures: Practice champions reported progress on registry implementation milestone achievement, and reported practice-level organizational capacity by using a modified version of the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC).

Key Results: Intervention practices were significantly more likely to have implemented a registry (44% vs 6%, = .04) and to have achieved more implementation milestones (5.5 vs 2.6, < .0001) than control practices. Baseline ACIC scores indicated room for organizational improvement with regard to chronic illness care (overall median, 6.4; range, 3.8 to 10.8) and clinical information systems use (median, 6.0; range, 0 to 11) with no significant differences between intervention and control practices.

Conclusions: Remotely provided guidance paired with limited in-person assistance can support rapid implementation of diabetes registries in typical primary care practices.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.190455DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

registry implementation
16
diabetes registry
12
diabetes registries
12
intervention supports
8
implementation
8
implementation diabetes
8
intervention practices
8
chronic illness
8
illness care
8
median range
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!