Background And Aims: The optimal method of gallbladder drainage (GBD) for acute cholecystitis in nonsurgical candidates is uncertain. The aim of the current study was to conduct a network meta-analysis comparing the 3 methods of GBD (percutaneous [PT], endoscopic transpapillary [ETP], and EUS-guided).

Methods: A comprehensive literature search for all comparative studies assessing the efficacy of either 2 or all modalities used for treatment of acute cholecystitis in patients at high risk for cholecystectomy was performed. Primary outcomes of technical and clinical success and postprocedure adverse events were assessed. Secondary outcomes were reintervention, unplanned readmissions, recurrent cholecystitis, and mortality.

Results: Ten studies were identified, comprising 1267 patients (472 EUS-GBD, 493 PT-GBD, and 302 ETP-GBD). In the network ranking estimate, PT-GBD and EUS-GBD had the highest likelihood of technical success (EUS-GBD vs PT-GBD vs ETP-GBD: 2.00 vs 1.02 vs 2.98) and clinical success (EUS-GBD vs PT-GBD vs ETP-GBD: 1.48 vs 1.55 vs 2.98). EUS-GBD had the lowest risk of recurrent cholecystitis (EUS-GBD vs PT-GBD vs ETP-GBD: 1.089 vs 2.02 vs 2.891). PT-GBD had the highest risk of reintervention (EUS-GBD vs PT-GBD vs ETP-GBD: 1.81 vs 2.99 vs 1.199) and unplanned readmissions (EUS-GBD vs PT-GBD vs ETP-GBD: 1.582 vs 2.944 vs 1.474), whereas ETP-GBD was associated with the lowest rates of mortality (EUS-GBD vs PT-GBD vs ETP-GBD: 2.62 vs 2.09 vs 1.29).

Conclusions: The 3 modalities of GBD have their respective advantages and disadvantages. Selection of technique will depend on available expertise. In centers with expertise in endoscopic GBD, the techniques are preferred over PT-GBD with improved outcomes. (Clinical trial registration number: CRD42020181972.).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.040DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

eus-gbd pt-gbd
24
pt-gbd etp-gbd
24
acute cholecystitis
12
pt-gbd
10
eus-gbd
9
endoscopic transpapillary
8
gallbladder drainage
8
network meta-analysis
8
clinical success
8
unplanned readmissions
8

Similar Publications

Over the last 40 years, the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has evolved from being diagnostic to therapeutic. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) and EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) are emerging techniques in recent years; however, there are limited studies and inconsistent results regarding these techniques. In addition, EUS has become a more common alternative to traditional interventions due to its super minimally invasive nature, but the mobility of both the gallbladder and intestine makes it challenging to introduce stents.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Cholecystectomy is the standard treatment for average-risk patients with acute cholecystitis, but high-risk patients may benefit from alternatives like PT-GBD and EUS-GBD.
  • PT-GBD has limitations and is not suitable for every patient, especially those too ill to be transferred, making bedside EUS-GBD a viable option.
  • A case series showed that bedside EUS-GBD in the ICU was safe and effective for critically ill patients, but all required comfort care due to their serious conditions, suggesting the need for more research in this area.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study focuses on the effectiveness of minimally invasive endoscopic procedures, particularly EUS-guided techniques, for treating patients with acute cholecystitis and common bile duct stones, especially those unfit for surgery.
  • It involved a retrospective evaluation of various procedures performed between January 2020 and June 2023, assessing both technical and clinical success rates as well as safety through adverse event rates.
  • Results indicated high success rates for EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) and percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PT-GBD) in high-risk patients, with low rates of adverse events, particularly for EUS-GBD.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has emerged over the last years as an alternative procedure to percutaneous drainage (PT)-GBD in patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) at high surgical risk. This process has been driven by the advent of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) with electrocautery-enhanced capability, which has rendered the drainage procedure easier to accomplish and safer. Studies and meta-analyses have proven the superiority of EUS-GBD over PT-GBD in high-surgical-risk patients with AC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Cholecystectomy (CCY) is the gold standard treatment of acute cholecystitis (AC). Nonsurgical management of AC includes percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PT-GBD) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD). This study aims to compare outcomes of patients who undergo CCY after having received EUS-GBD vs PT-GBD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!