A survey assessing the early effects of COVID-19 pandemic on oral and maxillofacial surgery training programs.

Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has specific implications for oral and maxillofacial surgeons because of an increased risk of exposure to the virus during surgical procedures involving the aerodigestive tract. The objective of this survey was to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic affected oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) training programs during the early phase of the pandemic.

Study Design: During the period April 3 to May 6, 2020, a cross-sectional survey was sent to the program directors of 95 of the 101 accredited OMFS training programs in the United States. The 35-question survey, designed by using Qualtrics software, aimed to elicit information about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on OMFS residency programs and the resulting specific modifications made to clinical care, PPE, and resident training/wellness.

Results: The survey response rate from OMFS program directors was 35% (33 of 95), with most responses from the states with a high incidence of COVID-19. All OMFS programs (100%) implemented guidelines to suspend elective and nonurgent surgical procedures and limited ambulatory clinic visits by third week of March, with the average date being March 16, 2020 (date range March 8-23). The programs used telemedicine (40%) and modified in-person visit (51%) protocols for dental and maxillofacial emergency triage to minimize the risk of exposure of HCP to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) was experienced by 51% of the programs. Almost two-thirds (63%) of the respondents recommended the use of a filtered respirator (i.e., N95 respirator) with full-face shield and stated that it was their preferred PPE, whereas 21% recommended the use of powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) during OMFS procedures. Only (73%) of the programs had resources for resident wellness and stress reduction. Virtual didactic training sessions conducted on digital platforms, most commonly Zoom, formed a major part of education for all programs.

Conclusions: All programs promptly responded to the pandemic by making appropriate changes, including suspending elective surgery and limiting patient care to emergent and urgent services. OMFS training programs should give more consideration to providing residents with adequate stress reduction resources to maintain their well-being and training and to minimize exposure risk during an evolving global epidemic.